Bowen also effectively argues that a lot of what is dismissed as “ratchet” or uncouth is really a conscious aesthetic of rebellion, a way of eschewing still white-centered patriarchal conventions that fail girls like herself. With behavior and style choices that make sense for their environment and circumstances, “ghetto girls,” she says, perform gender in rebellious ways that are often disrespected and yet envied and eventually emulated.
Bowen is a versatile and agile commentator, equally convincing and expert in her explication of the idea of the “bad bitch” as an expression of power in hip-hop and citing bell hooks on why beauty is a “politicized concept” that maintains what hooks called “imperialist, capitalist, white supremacist patriarchy.” The latter may seem like a long list of “isms” and labels, but Bowen shows that these dimensions of social hierarchy and control have real-world implications. She names and shames a system of cultural gatekeeping in which hip-hop and even Bowen’s beloved trap culture is complicit, assigning value and affording respect and opportunity to a select group. And, in keeping with that, as Bowen shows, even when Black girls are celebrated, it’s within a narrow range of acceptable images of Black femininity. Existing outside those “aesthetic rules” (as Bowen herself does) has consequences:
“It means that you’ve committed an egregious act against the social order. Women who find themselves too far away from the center of beauty norms are often treated as if they’ve committed treason, our aesthetic a public-facing betrayal of our refusal to conform…”
Complicating that analysis, Bowen also calls out the classism and cultural biases even within Black media circles where so many of her colleagues come from privilege and “have had to untangle their Blackness from the web of whiteness they were socialized in.” This is one reason Bowen is powerful; she takes no prisoners. Going against every tide, Bowen’s trap feminism enthusiastically celebrates “ghetto girl culture.” More than reconciling feminism with hip-hop, she marshals its power.
Misogynoir Transformed: Black Women’s Digital Resistance by Moya Bailey
Known for coining the term misogynoir, a portmanteau of the words “misogyny,” meaning the hatred of women, and noir, the French word for black, Northwestern professor Moya Bailey has already made a mark on the landscape of American culture that extends beyond academia. The term and its implications have penetrated popular consciousness. With her first solo-authored book, Bailey expands this impact.
As seen in the books on this list, the work of Patricia Hill Collins has influenced many writers in the Black feminist tradition, but with Bailey, that legacy is more direct. Building on works like Collins’ Black Feminist Thought and bell hooks’ Black Looks, Bailey expands our understanding of the link between media portrayals of Black women, which people like to think of as merely symbolic or superficial, and real world, material consequences:
“…the media that circulate misogynoir help maintain white supremacy by offering tacit approval of the disparate treatment that Black women negotiate in society. Whether the Jezebel, mammy, Sapphire, and later the ‘welfare queen’ or even the ‘strong Black woman’ archetype, misogynoiristic portrayals of Black women shape their livelihoods and health.”
In other words, contrary to those who would dismiss the weight of culture, Black feminist theory “articulates the power of the image.” By shaping the way that society views marginalized groups and how we view ourselves, cultural images help shape our social relations.
By design and necessity, this project is inherently political. Like Collins before her, Bailey’s work is significant on its own. But such work also adds essential perspective and depth to the efforts of political scientists like Angie Hancock, author of The Politics of Disgust whose research established in quantifiable terms the impact of the welfare queen image on public policy debates around the social safety net. Today, it’s hard to understand American politics without coming to grips with the concepts Bailey’s grappling with.
Bailey’s aims are ambitious. She’s not interested in just shining a light on misogynoir; she’s interested in its destruction. In a voice that is scholarly yet accessible, she tackles media culture from television and film to Tumblr to YouTube web series, to hashtags, revealing how different media contribute to, transform and/or challenge the pervasive circulation of misogynoir and, importantly, how Black people deploy digital activism to resist. Though expansive, Bailey’s scope is also strategic; she privileges those too often marginalized in feminist conversations: “Black women as well as Black nonbinary, agender, and gender-variant folks’ work and voices.” The penultimate chapter, “Alchemists in Action against Misogynoir, ” which is Bailey’s most personal, focuses on Tumblr. It’s a particular treat.
Digital Black Feminism by Catherine Knight Steele
In Digital Black Feminism, Catherine Knight Steele centers Black women unapologetically within the study of digital culture. “Digital Black feminism is a mechanism to understand how Black feminist thought is altered by and alters technology,” she writes. This work has multiple dimensions. First and fundamentally, Steele exposes the frequent oversight of Black women’s contributions as a distortion that limits deeper understanding of the dynamics of the digital world. As Steele establishes, Black women’s involvement in digital spaces has been broad-based, influential and persistent. Understanding that digital culture requires getting this part of it right.
So one contribution of Steele’s work is as a course correction to the work that’s been done before. At the same time, this book also recognizes and builds on the significant inroads made by scholars studying race and technology including Safiya Noble (Algorithms of Oppression), Sarah Florini, and Andre Brock.
Steele has two core aims. First, she positions Black women online as central to the future of communication technology just as they’ve been central to its past. Second, per its title, Digital Black Feminism traces and critically examines a evolutionary shift in Black feminism thought, one driven and enabled by new technology.
As both a researcher and a member of these spaces, she’s well-equipped for these tasks. Diving into a wide-ranging digital archive six years in the making, she demonstrates how online spaces expand and shape the work of Black feminist liberation while making insightful connections to the Black thinkers and writers that came before. In one chapter, Steele explores the parallels between hip-hop’s formative influence on an earlier generation of feminists and the role of digital technology in Black feminism today, noting how money changed both of those relationships. For a book with heft, it strikes an impressive balance of accessibility and intellectual innovation.