In an email, the SFCM press office told KQED that it investigates every Title IX complaint, and had been following a process created by its legal counsel in 2022. “This report has revealed clear changes that need to be made to our process and we are grateful for this opportunity to improve our work,” the statement reads.
OCR investigators determined that the university failed to preserve the accuser’s equal access to classes, performances and educational programs; failed to notify the involved parties in writing of the Title IX grievance process or the full scope of the allegations being investigated; failed to offer the parties an opportunity to review the evidence included in the investigative report at least 10 days prior to its completion; and failed to hold a live hearing. Additionally, the OCR found that the university did not notify the student of her right to appeal its determination on her case.
“Based upon the preponderance of the evidence, OCR determined that the Conservatory had actual notice of alleged sexual harassment, including two alleged sexual assaults and alleged stalking of the student, in its education program and responded in a manner that was deliberately indifferent,” reads a Jan. 10 letter to Conservatory President David H. Stull from the Department of Education.