The Pines at Placerville Healthcare Center in Placerville, a nursing and short-term rehabilitation facility, on Jan. 21, 2022. (Miguel Gutierrez Jr./CalMatters)
Four days after Celine started working as a nursing assistant in the COVID-19 unit at a Placerville nursing home, she tested positive for the virus. She was fatigued and weak and had a dry cough — but she kept working. She said she has worked 13 days in the last two weeks, frequently taking care of more than a dozen patients at a time or working a double shift when asked.
“I’d have to sit down at least 10 minutes because I just get tired, and I’m still tired honestly,” said Celine, who works at the Pines at Placerville Healthcare Center, and asked not to be fully identified because she fears losing her job.
Severe worker shortages — worsened by the omicron surge — have forced some of California’s long-term care facilities to rely on COVID-positive staff for patient care. According to state data, 11,500 long-term care center workers, or roughly 8% of the workforce, are now infected with COVID. That's 48 times as many as were infected at the beginning of December, when omicron emerged, even though 93% of them are fully vaccinated.
The California Department of Public Health earlier this month quietly issued controversial emergency guidelines allowing infected health care employees with no symptoms to continue working. And at facilities with the most severe staffing shortages, symptomatic staff are allowed to work with COVID patients.
Since the latest omicron-fueled surge, Celine said she’s actually worked more overtime and cared for more patients than usual, despite having the virus.
“There really wasn’t a lot of staff at the beginning to work the COVID unit, so that’s why I continue to work,” she said. “It’s really hard to get staff in the building because a lot of people are afraid. If [workers] did not feel well enough, they didn’t force anybody to work.”
Sponsored
So many workers are sick that the company installed a portable toilet in the parking lot for them to use away from the nursing home residents. Water pumped in for handwashing freezes at night, and some colleagues go home or to a nearby McDonald's to use the restroom, she said.
The Pines at Placerville did not respond to multiple requests for comment.
At the Grant Cuesta Sub-Acute and Rehabilitation Center in Mountain View, a certified nursing assistant, who also did not want to be identified to protect her job, said she was asked to return to work five days after contracting COVID-19. State and federal health guidelines have sanctioned five-day quarantines or shorter at facilities with critical staffing shortages, but her lingering cough and body aches convinced her to refuse.
Now, three weeks later, she is back at work, surrounded by colleagues who tell her they too are COVID-19-positive, she said.
“It’s been like one co-worker after another, after another, everyone getting sick,” she said.
Nine residents also have the virus, and the facility has set up an isolation ward.
“No matter how much you protect yourself, we’re still eating in the same dining room,” she said, noting that workers who test positive are required to wear N95 masks. “You know, we’re still sharing the same restroom. So what’s the whole point? It’s almost like they don’t care about us getting sick.”
Grant Cuesta also did not respond to multiple requests for comment.
While vaccination and testing requirements have helped bring those numbers down, the omicron surge is now hampering facilities’ ability to prevent the spread of the virus among residents, who are often elderly and medically vulnerable.
“For me, I think this wave was a shocker only because it swept through boosted and vaccinated people,” said Christina Lockyer-White, a certified nursing assistant at Kingston Healthcare Center in Bakersfield.
Staff members there are required to wear full protective equipment including face shields, gowns, gloves and N95 masks throughout the facility, but several have tested positive regardless, Lockyer-White said.
“We didn’t think we’d be in this position, and here we are,” Lockyer-White said. “It’s like reliving a nightmare.”
'Help wanted': Long-term shortage of workers
Workplace shortages have plagued nursing homes and memory-care and assisted-living centers for years, driven by an aging population, stagnant wages and dwindling training programs.
“I’ve been a nurse in long-term care for over 25 years, and there’s never been a time where we haven’t had a ‘help wanted’ sign out in some form,” said Claire Enright, workforce specialist at the California Association of Health Facilities, which represents skilled nursing facilities.
“Five to six years ago, there were over 600 training programs for [certified nursing assistants] in the state. We’re down to around 300,” she said.
Related Coverage
Skilled nursing facilities provide 24-hour medical care for sick residents who require constant monitoring or rehabilitation. Other long-term care facilities, such as assisted-living and memory-care centers, as well as some retirement homes, are for residents who need help with some daily activities.
Even before the pandemic, most long-term care facilities struggled to hire enough staff, like certified nursing assistants and registered nurses, who often work very demanding jobs for minimal pay. But the last two years have stretched many of these facilities to their breaking points. Nationwide, hundreds of thousands of long-term care workers have left their jobs, more than in any other health care sector, according to the American Health Care Association/National Center for Assisted Living.
Staff shortages also are directly affecting capacity at these facilities. Before the pandemic, most nursing homes in California operated at about 88% capacity. Now that’s down to 70% to 75%, Enright said.
Enright said the association has heard of some long-term care facilities relying on COVID-19-positive employees during this surge, but she said there’s no way of telling how many of them are actually caring for patients.
Staff shortages vs. sick workers
Omicron has been a nightmare for families of residents, too.
Two weeks ago, Miriam Raftery’s 91-year-old mother, Mary, contracted COVID-19 in her La Mesa memory-care facility. She’s now in an isolation room by herself, and Raftery said she isn’t allowed to visit her.
“It is scary. They say dry cough, but who knows. At 91, she’s very frail. It’s frightening,” Raftery said.
What frightens Raftery even more, however, is Mary being left alone in isolation. During last winter’s surge, most long-term care facilities implemented strict lockdown measures.
“When she was in that first place, she would just cry. They’d let me have window visits. She couldn’t really hear me very well, but she would just cry and plead with me to take her home. She didn’t understand what was happening,” Raftery said.
Now, with her mom confined to an isolation room, Raftery is concerned she will get depressed again or, worse, injure herself.
Mary has dementia and is considered a high-fall risk — she forgets that she can’t walk unassisted, Raftery said, who grew so concerned about her falling that she hired a private caregiver to sit with her for eight hours a day.
“I felt like I had no choice,” Raftery said. “It’s costing me $5,500 to do this for her, but given her history of serious falls and winding up in hospital multiple times from falling out of bed at these other places, you know, when she was left unattended during the day.”
Raftery said Mary already has experienced the consequences of understaffed facilities. She’s been in four homes in the San Diego area since February, moving each time Raftery discovered possible signs of neglect. When Raftery questioned those facilities about why no one was monitoring her mother, she said she was told there wasn’t enough staff to do so.
“The facilities she’s been in, they were all losing people because certain people didn’t want to get vaccinated or they were just fed up,” Raftery said.
Families and advocates say staffing shortages caused by the omicron wave are a catch-22: Sick workers risk spreading the disease to elderly and vulnerable residents, but understaffing leads to neglect and inadequate care.
“I get why [the state health department] has opened the doors to asymptomatic workers, but it’s still highly transmissible, whether we’re asymptomatic or not, whether we’re vaccinated or not, right? So it’s a scary proposition,” said Maitely Weismann, co-founder of the Essential Caregivers Coalition.
Weismann’s 79-year-old mother, Celia, lives in a Los Angeles-area assisted-living facility, where there was an outbreak last year — which she narrowly avoided because of an unrelated hospital stay. Now she’s worried her mom will catch COVID this time around.
Even though her mother is vaccinated and boosted, Weismann said she hears about people with similar conditions and disabilities dying from the disease.
The state health department has come under fire for insufficient oversight of nursing homes, with some families alleging their loved ones died of COVID-19 after sick staff were forced to work.
But for some, having reliable, COVID-positive staff available to care for their relatives is better than no one at all.
“Personally, if someone’s positive and comes in, I’m OK with that because I would rather my mom have the care that she needs than have her be neglected,” said San Diego resident Angela Trivonovich. “I’ve seen the results of neglect and not a lot of care in a nursing home. I would rather her not get severe diaper rash. I’d rather her not get a bed sore.”
Trivonovich said she was just notified that 22 workers have tested positive in the last two weeks at the facility where her 84-year-old mother lives.
“If people feel good and they come in positive, I don’t know if that’s going to spread it any more than it does already. And I think the residents need all the care they can get,” she said. “They’re desperate.”
Sponsored
CalMatters reporter Alejandro Lazo contributed to this report.
lower waypoint
Stay in touch. Sign up for our daily newsletter.
To learn more about how we use your information, please read our privacy policy.