Budhai said the highway could close as early as the first quarter of 2025, which helped fuel his desire for the recall. Engardio’s term is set to end in 2027.
“None of the traffic mitigations or whatever have been put into place yet,” Budhai said. “It’s just a giant experiment while the Great Highway closes. And we’ll just see what happens with the 20,000 cars that use it almost daily and see how they traverse the neighborhood.”
Westside residents in Districts 1, 4, 7 and 11 — encompassing the Richmond, Sunset and Excelsior neighborhoods — voted overwhelmingly against Proposition K, with only 39% in favor and 61% opposed. The results were the opposite across the rest of the city to the east, with a 64% yes vote to 36% no.
“We have a supervisor that disenfranchised his district. Is there a better case for a recall?” said Correia, also with the group Open the Great Highway. “Recalls are complicated and give us all pause for mixed feelings about them. I can say for myself and the people that I’ve talked to that this is the right time for a recall.”
Budhai said the recall campaign has three months to gather at least 9,900 District 4 voters’ signatures to put a recall measure on the ballot. If the group collects enough signatures, the Department of Elections will hold a special election in the district.
Other westside residents who supported Proposition K said it would protect the beach, dunes and coastal neighborhoods from erosion from extreme storms, flooding and future sea-level rise. The two-mile stretch of the highway has been closed up to 65 times per year since 2020 due to windblown sand, which costs the city $1.7 million yearly to clear, according to the proposal.
“This stretch of road is closed a lot to cars because the sand blows on the road, and it’s not safe for cars to drive, which is part of what makes it an unreliable road,” said Heidi Moseson, who has lived along the lower Great Highway for 15 years.
Dec. 3: Recall organizers gave an updated figure for the number of signatures they have to gather after getting clarification from the Department of Elections. They will need at least 9,900 District 4 voters’ signatures, not 7,510.