Supervisor Eric Mar was among those who voted against expanding the ban. He said he felt the legislation was a waste of the supervisors’ time.
“This may be an issue about one neighborhood and one plaza,” Mar said.
Supervisors Jane Kim, John Avalos, Christina Olague and David Campos joined Mar in opposing the ban. You can hear full audio of the debate over the legislation below.
During Tuesday’s meeting the supervisors also approved a building code change that could allow apartments the size of living rooms in San Francisco. At 220 square feet – including kitchen, bathroom, closet and a 150-square-foot living room – the new “micro-units” could be among the smallest apartments in the country. You can see artist’s renderings and floor plans here; KQED’s Forum hosted a discussion about the proposal on Monday which you can listen to here.
Avalos was the lone supervisor to vote against the measure.
KQED News reported live on the supervisors’ meeting. Some of the updates we posted are below.
UPDATE 4:13 p.m.: Some of Supervisor Scott Wiener’s comments in response to supervisors who said they were voting against expanding the nudity ban:
“We are a city of free expression.”
“I don’t agree that having yellow hair is the same as exposing your penis at a busy street corner for hours and hours.”
“Free expression in the abstract is really nice… until it comes to your neighborhood.”
“I wonder what would happen if naked guys started hanging out in the Richmond.. or in Balboa Park.”
“I guarantee people would not have waited as long as we waited in the Castro.”
UPDATE 4:07 p.m.: Here are some comments from supervisors who voted against expanding the ban.
Supervisor Christina Olague: “When we start surrendering these rights, what’s next?” Responding to Supervisor Scott Wiener’s comment that he has heard several complaints about public nudity, Olague said she gets more emails about the city’s homeless problem than any other issue. But “I would be the last person to legislate any homeless people from any neighborhood or any part of the city.”
Supervisor John Avalos said reports of nudity in the city were of “inconsequential nudity” and “meaningless.”
Supervisor Eric Mar: “This may be an issue about one neighborhood and one plaza.” He said legislation expanding the ban was a waste of supervisors’ time.
UPDATE 3:58 p.m.:
UPDATE 3:23 p.m.: Supervisor Scott Wiener’s comments on his proposed legislation changing the city’s nudity ban:
“Over the past two years the situation on our streets and particular in the Castro has changed. It’s no longer random and sporadic.”
“In the Castro, it’s seven days a week.”
“It’s very much a ‘hey look what I have’ mentality.”
“Many people in this neighborhood are over it and believe it’s time to take action.”
“The Castro and San Francisco is a place of freedom of expression and acceptance.”
“It doesn’t mean that we have no standards whatsoever.”
“I say this as a gay man who was drawn to the Castro in the 1990s.”
“The Castro is a neighborhood for everyone, gay and straight.”
“The dominant demographic expressing concern… has been gay men. I’ve heard from far more gay men expressing support for this legislation than straight.”
UPDATE 2:43 p.m.: The San Francisco Board of Supervisors voted 10-1 to reduce the city’s minimum apartment size. Supervisor John Avalos cast the lone no vote, stating that he “can’t stomach supporting this idea.”
