upper waypoint

‘Suburban Fury’ Allows Attempted Gerald Ford Assassin to Tell Her Own Story

Save ArticleSave Article
Failed to save article

Please try again

A senior woman, dressed all in black, sits in the back of a car on a hillside overlooking San Francisco.
Sara Jane Moore in a scene from ‘Suburban Fury.’

On Sept. 22, 1975, a 45-year-old mom named Sara Jane Moore drove to downtown San Francisco, positioned herself in a crowd outside the St. Francis Hotel and attempted to shoot President Gerald Ford with a .38 pistol. (She missed only because the gun had an inaccurate sight.) After her arrest, it was revealed that Moore had spent the previous 18 months infiltrating radical Bay Area political groups and working as an FBI informant. She has been a confounding figure in Bay Area history ever since.

The prospect of hearing Moore speak at length about her life, then, is a tantalizing one. Her participation in the new documentary Surburban Fury, which screens Oct. 20 in San Francisco, was agreed to on the condition that she be the only interviewee.

The film gives Moore the space to tell her own story from different locations: the back of a station wagon, a grand room in the St. Francis Hotel, the rear of a house in Danville. These interview clips are interspersed with narration drawn from Moore’s recollections of conversations with her FBI control agent. The movie is rich with archival footage of the turbulent political and social events of 1970s Bay Area.

The choppy structure of Suburban Fury often makes for a disjointed viewing experience, exacerbated by Moore herself. At times, the would-be assassin seems thoroughly irritated by the interview process, entirely incapable of introspection or empathy, and unwilling to consider that her actions as an informant may have brought harm to the activists she reported on. The way she describes her decision to kill the president is utterly devoid of emotion. Moore provides only an overview of events in her life, as they happened — a surface rendering of an extraordinary turn of events that would greatly benefit from deeper analysis.

Moore’s versions of the conversations she had with FBI control agent Bert Worthington offer additional illumination, but frequently raise more questions. At one point, the Worthington narration is heard stating: “In the last ten months, [Moore] has created divisiveness and mistrust in many organizations by her personal actions and rumor mongering. Sally Moore is a dangerous individual and a security risk to all movement organizations.” Did Moore somehow see Worthington’s notes about her? Did he tell her this directly? Suburban Fury never explains.

An elderly woman sits in the rear seat of the back seat of a Plymouth car, looking stunned. Behind the car, a man in a suit looks over a city skyline at night.
Sara Jane Moore in ‘Suburban Fury.’

Moore first became involved with the FBI after volunteering to help the Hearst family when Patricia Hearst was kidnapped by the Symbionese Liberation Army (SLA) in 1974. This one action placed Moore on a path that exposed her to a wide variety of radical political groups, most of whom opened her eyes to wider social issues and apparently impressed her. (At one point, it’s noted here that Moore thought the SLA were “charismatic, compelling people.”)

Sponsored

Her positive feelings about activist groups did not, for some reason, stop Moore from informing the FBI about them, an explanation for which is never given. She describes eventually telling the truth about herself to one group that she’d infiltrated (“I’m a pig,” she apparently announced) but it’s difficult to pin down exactly what led to this moment. Shortly after she blew her own cover, Moore made her Ford assassination attempt.

Because of the limitations Moore imposed on Suburban Fury in regards to other interviewees, the documentary misses an opportunity to examine the parallels between Moore and Hearst. Both were sheltered women who, once exposed to radical Bay Area politics, took extreme actions that endangered their own lives and landed them in prison. A much richer examination of the period might have been possible in the documentary if this element of Moore’s story was given more commentary — especially since Moore is quoted as calling Hearst “stupid and foolish,” and stating that “she was not the brightest bulb on the string.”

In the end, the most satisfying and rewarding aspect of Suburban Fury is its wealth of wonderful archival footage. The clips of national politicians and news events, juxtaposed with footage of radical Bay Area political groups, are a joy to behold, as are the street scenes of San Francisco and Oakland in the tempestuous 1970s.

Director Robinson Devor seems to assume his viewers are arriving to Suburban Fury fully armed with a solid knowledge of 1970s Bay Area political groups and events. Those who are will marvel at the footage he presents here. For those less knowledgable on the topic, Suburban Fury is likely to be almost as confounding as Moore has always been.


Suburban Fury’ screens at San Francisco’s Vogue Theater (3290 Sacramento St.) on Oct. 20, 2024, as part of SF Film’s ‘Doc Stories’ festival.

lower waypoint
next waypoint