upper waypoint

Alameda County Bans Rubber Bullets, Other Police Projectiles for Crowd Control Following Lawsuit From BLM Protesters

Save ArticleSave Article
Failed to save article

Please try again

a row of police officers in combat gear faces a row of protestors, one holding a sign that says 'I can't breathe #FTP'
A demonstrator comes face-to-face with police outside Oakland Police Department headquarters on May 29, 2020, in the midst of a protest following the murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis. (Beth LaBerge/KQED)

Alameda County has agreed to ban rubber bullets, beanbags and less-lethal munitions for crowd control as part of a settlement after sheriff’s deputies fired rubber bullets and injured two people protesting police brutality in 2020, the plaintiffs' lawyer said Thursday.

Oakland police officers and Alameda County sheriff’s deputies used tear gas to disperse demonstrators in Oakland during a June 1, 2020, protest, and deputies indiscriminately fired rubber bullets at the crowd, shooting Tosh Sears in the hip and Kierra Brown in the calf, according to a federal lawsuit against Alameda County and the city of Oakland.

Related Stories

Sears and Brown, along with thousands of others, took to the streets to protest police brutality and racial injustice after a white Minneapolis officer killed George Floyd, a Black man.

Since 2003, the city of Oakland has had a policy banning the use of rubber bullets and beanbags for crowd control unless there was an “immediate danger of death or great bodily injury." But the police department allowed Alameda County sheriff's deputies, who were assisting city officers during the protests, to fire impact munitions into crowds that were largely peaceful, attorney Rachel Laderman said.

“Alameda County sheriff was really the main actor in terms of using impact munitions in an indiscriminate manner, shooting willy-nilly into the crowd,” Laderman said.

Sponsored

The settlement restricts the sheriff’s department's use of impact munitions and flash-bang grenades to situations where it’s necessary to defend against the threat to life or serious bodily injury or to bring a dangerous and unlawful situation under control, she added.

It also bans the use of shotgun-fired munitions by both the Oakland Police Department and the Alameda County Sheriff's Office, and all restrictions apply not only to political demonstrations but any type of crowd event in the county, Laderman said.

Attorneys for the city of Oakland and Alameda County did not immediately respond to emails seeking comment.

The use of tear gas, pepper balls, lead-filled beanbags, flash-bangs, smoke bombs and other less-lethal weapons became a flashpoint in the debate over policing in 2020 after dozens of incidents throughout the country of protesters being struck by projectiles or caught up in clouds of tear gas unleashed on mostly peaceful crowds.

In February, the Police Executive Research Forum, an organization dedicated to improving the professionalism of policing, said in a report the federal government should create guidelines on the use of less-lethal weapons by law enforcement.

In the lawsuit filed against Oakland and Alameda County, Sears and Brown said officers and deputies began tear-gassing the demonstrators without warning.

“Nothing will erase the emotional pain and terror I felt on June 1, 2020,” Sears said in a statement released by Laderman. “I grew up with family members who were police officers, including my grandfather ... but I just don’t feel safe around police as a Black man. I’m hoping this settlement is a small part of achieving some real change.”

Sears and Brown will share $250,000 as part of the settlement.

KQED's Adhiti Bandlamudi contributed reporting.

lower waypoint
next waypoint