Six years after San Francisco created an office meant to help sexual assault survivors and hold city departments accountable for their handling of complaints, the Board of Supervisors is digging into why the initiative hasn’t appeared to bring about meaningful change.
In a City Hall hearing on Thursday morning, supervisors questioned those in charge of the Office of Sexual Harassment and Assault Response and Prevention, or SHARP, following high-profile allegations against a rising local political star and a San Francisco Chronicle review of public records finding that SHARP fell far short of its mission.
The office is mandated to help survivors navigate San Francisco’s bureaucratic systems and report city officers should they fail to help. SHARP was also tasked with suggesting policy reforms for government agencies to better help victims; it has proposed no such policies for the San Francisco Police Department, the district attorney’s office or San Francisco General Hospital, the three largest city agencies that sexual assault survivors often encounter, the Chronicle reported.
Sheryl Evans Davis, the executive director of the Human Rights Commission, which oversees SHARP, said during the hearing that although officials have performed meaningful community outreach, SHARP didn’t meet its mission to reform city government.
“We are apologetic and regretful, but we are also committed to doing better,” Davis said. “We’ve had some shortcomings here.”