upper waypoint

From the Dean Scream to Brat Memes

Save ArticleSave Article
Failed to save article

Please try again

Howard Dean, a man with gray hair and wearing a suit, joyfully raises his fists in the air against a blue background.
Former Gov. Howard Dean (D-VT) reenacts his Iowa Caucus "Dean Scream" moment during closing remarks on the second day of the Democratic National Convention at the Wells Fargo Center, July 26, 2016 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

This episode was originally published October 12, 2024.

View the full episode transcript.

In this episode of Close All Tabs, host Morgan Sung takes us through the evolution of online campaigning—from the early days of dial-up modems to today’s Twitch streams. We’ll revisit iconic moments like “the Dean scream” and “Pokemon Go to the polls,” examine how memes became a legitimate political force, and discuss why Kamala Harris and Donald Trump are turning to podcasters and streamers to reach voters.

Want to give us feedback on the show? Shoot us an email at CloseAllTabs@KQED.org

Follow us on Instagram


Sponsored

Episode Transcript

 

Morgan Sung  So this year, the 2024 presidential candidates are taking a nontraditional approach to media appearances. 

All The Smoke: Welcome back to all the smoke. We got a very special guest today. Very excited to sit down and talk to our biggest guest. Yeah, I wouldn’t lie about that.

Morgan Sung: That’s Kamala Harris’s iconic laugh on the sports podcast. All the smoke. The vice president was also recently on the massively popular and often very raunchy podcast Call Her Daddy, where she talks about reproductive rights. 

Kamala Harris: I was the first vice president or president to ever go to a reproductive health care clinic. Ever. 

Alex Cooper Really? 

Kamala Harris Yes. Yes. 

Alex Cooper I didn’t know that. But I guess that makes sense. 

Morgan Sung: Former President Donald Trump has also been making the rounds this year on non-mainstream media. Like back in June, he was on YouTuber turned podcaster Logan Paul’s show, where he brought T-shirts with his own face on them. 

Donald Trump  This is uh 

Logan Paul  Is this your mugshot? Oh my you’re a gangster! 

Donald Trump  Well, Elvis had one. Frank Sinatra had one.

Morgan Sung: Then Trump went on comedian Cobain’s podcast and quizzed him about the details of his drug use. 

Donald Trump: Is cocaine a stronger up? 

Theo Von: Yeah. Yeah, yeah. Cocaine will make you…

Donald Trump: So you you way up with cocaine more than anything else, you can think of. 

Theo Von: Cocaine will turn you into a damn owl homie. You know what I’m saying? 

Morgan Sung:  But the wildest appearance was when he live streamed with influencer Aidn Ross. 

Adin Ross: Well, today is going to be the most important stream I’ve ever done, first of all. 

Donald Trump: Yeah, you’re right in the living room of Mar a Lago. You’re the first. Just about. 

Adin Ross:  Thank you. 

Donald Trump:  And we’ll have a little fun today. 

Adin Ross: Let’s do it. 

Donald Trump: And my son Barron says hello. He’s a great young guy, but he’s a big fan of yours. 

Morgan Sung: Aidan Ross is a very controversial streamer who’s known for collabing with a white supremacist and for getting banned from Twitch for hate speech. Twitch is the most popular platform for streamers, and now he’s one of the most followed streamers on Kik, which is an alternative platform with fewer rules. At the end of this extremely random collab, Aidan Ross gifts Trump a red, white and blue Tesla cybertruck and plastered on the side is the photo of Trump after his first assassination attempt. Blood on his face fist raised. 

Donald Trump: Yeah, I can. Wow. 

Adin Ross: You can’t miss it. 

Donald Trump: That’s an Elon. 

Adin Ross: That is an Elon. 

Donald Trump:  Wow. 

Adin Ross: Shout out to Mr. Musk. 

Donald Trump: That’s beautiful. 

Morgan Sung: A presidential candidate showing up to chat with his teenage son’s favorite podcasters would have seemed like a fever dream in elections past. But it didn’t happen out of the blue. It’s part of a calculated effort by Trump’s team to capitalize on our current reality, where social media posts, memes and influencers all have the power to make or break a campaign. So how did we get here? Come with me on a little dive into the history of elections and the internet. This is Close All Tabs, a special series from KQED. I’m Morgan Sung. I’m a tech journalist, you’re chronically online friend,  and your guide to the weirdest and most fascinating corners of the Internet. Together, we’re diving into election memes, disinformation campaigns, political influencers, and will open as many browser tabs as it takes, all to better understand how the digital world affects our real lives. Let’s get into it. We’re going all the way back to the olden days of the internet, the 1990s. So to start, we’re going to open a new tab. What’s the first campaign website? 

Morgan Sung: The year is 1996. This is like the bronze age of the Internet. And it’s like we’re seeing the earliest forms of human writing, except these are websites. Incumbent President Bill Clinton and his VP, Al Gore, launch their website, which features a slideshow and a message banner running across the bottom of the page. It was considered so cutting edge that they held a press conference just to show people how to use it. 

Al Gore: I’m proud to officially unveil the Clinton Gore 96 homepage: www.cg96.org. For those of you who want to put it in your bookmarks. 

Morgan Sung: It’s a lot of text and very few interactive elements. You can sign up for email updates and download principal bumper stickers, but it’s basically just a brochure. The Republican opponents, Bob Dole and Jack Kemp, also launched their site, which is actually still online today. Theirs was a little more interactive, like they even had a Bob Dole themed crossword puzzle, but it was still a one way megaphone. The campaign could broadcast its message, but there is no real way for voters to answer back. Fast forward to 2003. Howard Dean, the Democratic governor of Vermont, becomes what Politico calls, “the father of all web campaigns.” So Dean’s team launches the first ever presidential campaign blog, including comments from visitors. They organize events on meetup.com, and they focus on capturing very small donations from everyday voters. They pull this off by turning fundraising into a game. So for every fundraising event, there’s a clip art image of a baseball bat on the website. And you’ve seen this before, as they get closer to their goal, the bat fills up like a thermometer. People love watching the bat. And all of this makes supporters feel like they’re directly involved with the campaign. The campaign raises millions of dollars and develops a very online, very devoted network of supporters. But unfortunately, today, Howard Dean’s campaign is really remembered, for one thing. 

Howard Dean:  You know something? You know something.

Morgan Sung: On January 19th, 2004, he gives a speech at the Val Air Ballroom in Iowa about their strong showing in the caucuses. The crowd is amped. But let’s just say Howard Dean gets a little bit too excited.

Howard Dean: We’re going to California and Texas and New York, and then we’re going to Washington, D.C. to take back the White House. Yeah!  

Morgan Sung: That sound becomes known as the Dean scream, and it’s considered to be one of the first political memes to go viral. It’s so infamous that it may have actually ruined Dean’s chances as a candidate. He ends up flopping in the primaries and drops out of the race early.

Howard DeanYeah! 

Morgan Sung: But one thing they can never take away from Dean is his status as a digital campaign pioneer. He created the blueprint that other campaigns would follow, including one that would become a genuine revolution in political organizing. Barack Obama’s presidential campaign. Okay. New Tab. Obama Internet First Campaign. Okay. So if the early 90s are the Bronze Age, 2008 is the renaissance and social media is our printing press. Facebook, YouTube and Twitter are all brand new. 

Rahaf Harfoush:  I remember President Obama was one of the first candidates to start doing YouTube lives and they started uploading clips of him just like playing basketball and just talking to the camera and fireside chats. 

Morgan Sung:  Rahaf Harfoush is a digital anthropologist who researches how emerging technology like AI influences communication. 

Rahaf Harfoush: And now, in 2024, this seems so basic and beyond the bare minimum. But back then, he was really the first candidate to treat YouTube seriously and to understand the power of connecting directly with voters without the intermediary of the press. 

Morgan Sung: Back in 2008, Raha volunteered on Obama’s digital media team, which she wrote about in her book. Yes, we did. 

Rahaf Harfoush: The thing that really stood out to me was the fact that the campaign understood very early on that social media was a two way street. So a lot of the resources that were being provided for people was the infrastructure for people to be able to take information and go out and organize in their own communities. 

Morgan Sung: Rahaf says the campaign was incredibly effective when it came to mobilizing volunteers online. They built a social network of volunteers called MYBO, which stands for My Barack Obama. And it was like a sophisticated, revamped version of Howard Dean’s website. 

Rahaf Harfoush: And that was where you could download all sorts of assets like how to register your friends and family to vote, how to talk to people about specific issues, how to organize a successful meeting, scripts for talking to your neighbors and talking to your friends, little icons for your profile. And then on Facebook, I remember being very amused because I would see like small dog owners for Obama.  

Morgan Sung: Right. 

Rahaf Harfoush:  It was just so interesting to see  how people were organizing. 

Morgan Sung: Can you think of other ways that this 2008 campaign laid the groundwork for the kind of campaigning that we’re seeing today? 

Rahaf Harfoush: It changed political campaign strategy permanently in a lot of different ways. The visual representation and design people really have started to elevate thinking about politicians as a brand. So like the color palette, the font, the language, the mood. It looked interesting and it looked cool. 

Morgan Sung: Right? And it created this like such an iconic image of Obama. I mean, I still remember that red, white and blue Hope poster that was everywhere. Everyone wanted a copy. 

Rahaf Harfoush: Yeah, I have one in my I have one, a signed one  in my living room downstairs.

Morgan Sung: Oh My God. Wow. 

Rahaf Harfoush: But that’s that’s the thing. I can’t think of any other. Well, maybe the the MAGA hat now that has become as iconic, but other than that, like political artifacts, political campaign artifacts are not usually that prevalent in mainstream culture, I would say, so. 

Morgan Sung:  It really reminded me of like tour merch, you know? 

Rahaf Harfoush: Yes. 

Morgan Sung: Like creating this like megastar where everyone wanted a piece of like their merch. 

Rahaf Harfoush: I think branding really changed the way that politicians talked about themselves and positioned themselves in the market of  political ideas. 

Morgan Sung: Going into the 2012 election, the Obama brand is stronger than ever. He uses Twitter to announce his reelection campaign. He doesn’t. Amy on Reddit. His administration is super active on Tumblr. Celebrities and musicians are showing up for him. It’s all part of this calculated effort to maintain the brand. 

Rahaf Harfoush: And there were some clips that his team was really clever in circulating Obama. I remember there was like a clip that went viral back then where it was like he was in an interview and there was a fly flying around and he just like. 

Barack Obama: Nice. Now, where were we? That was pretty impressive wasn’t it?  I got it. I got the sucker. 

Rahaf HarfoushAnd everyone was like, What? You know, and him taking the three point shot and like, yeah, it was just they just gave him, I think, a really cool factor. 

Morgan Sung: Mitt Romney, who is known for being profoundly uncool, does not stand a chance in this new digital arena. Back in 2008, the Obama campaign developed these super effective, targeted email campaigns. And by 2012, they’re even better. They get incredibly good at analytics and understanding individual people. Rahaf explains this concept of hyper segmentation. 

Rahaf Harfoush: Which is not just categorizing people by gender, region or, you know, interest, but really being able to say, again, you know, you’re a person who has a dog who’s interested in health care and you are a teacher and you have two kids, and this is going to be the special communication that’s going to arrive to you via email via text messaging. 

Morgan Sung: And this makes voters feel heard by the campaign. 

Rahaf Harfoush: The idea that voters could identify the issue that was important to them, then they would receive customized texts about each issue that mattered to them. That at the time was like revolutionary. It was cutting edge analytics. So I remember thinking, oh this is going to make every person feel like the campaign is speaking directly to them about issues that they care about. And so 2008 was really about social media. It set the stage for that conversation. And then, you know, 2012 was about micro segmentation. And then 2016 was really about, you know, algorithmic preferences. 

Morgan Sung: By 2016, social media algorithms are starting to really shape what we see online and in terms of digital campaigning. That’s when shit hits the fan. We’ll hear about that and more after this break. Okay. We’ve arrived at 2016. It’s time for another tab. Did memes ruin the 2016 election?  Okay, so we’ve had the Bronze Age, the Renaissance. That brings us to the Industrial Revolution, which is fitting because this era is all about the mass production of memes. Let me set the scene for you. Vine that short form video app is still around. Everyone is playing Pokemon Go. Hamilton Fever is still white hot. And in politics, digital campaigning becomes less about building a top down organizing system like Obama created. It’s more about harnessing collective action from increasingly influential Internet communities. And in 2016 memes play a huge part in the election. If you want to get exposure, memes are the way to do it. But it’s not like campaign strategists intentionally thrust their candidates into meme culture. Instead, meme culture happens to them. Ted Cruz’s campaign is derailed by memes comparing him to the Zodiac Killer. Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders both amass armies of chronically online supporters who incessantly post memes skewering their opponents. And Hillary Clinton keeps accidentally going viral on Vine. 

Hillary Clinton: I’m just chillin in Cedar Rapids. I don’t know who created Pokemon Go. But I’m trying to figure out how we get them to have Pokémon Go To The Polls. 

Morgan Sung: It’s this kind of virality that makes 2016 so memorable. Of course, people were using the internet before this time, but internet culture was seen as an almost underground subculture — but now, this subculture starts to trickle into the mainstream. 

Aidan Walker: You know, academic researchers what they kept saying was like 2016, 2017, that’s when like, normal people were really logged on to the Internet. 

Morgan Sung: This is Aidan Walker. He’s an Internet researcher and content creator who’s written for academic journals and also the website Know Your Meme. He’s something of an anthropologist of memes. 

Aidan Walker: And I think that’s sort of a moment where we start to see sort of the news being downstream of memes. You know, something will happen on Twitter. Often it’s a Trump tweet and then the next day CNN has to cover it. And that’s kind of driving the national story. And so 2016, I think, is a year where we see more organizing online. But the organizing is kind of there maybe not because some digital Karl Rove had some brilliant strategy to put it there, but just because so much of the conversation was moving there, the normal people, the normal voters were there. 

Morgan Sung: By normal people, Aidan means those who hadn’t previously been active participants in online communities. They were online, but they only really interacted with people they knew in real life. 

Aidan Walker: I think it’s also an age of means that aren’t just one offs. So in 2016, there’s a lot of like meme systems, I might say like meme families, and these will be like, you know, 100, 200 memes where you’re kind of taking the same character or the same face and just putting it in new settings, new environments. You know, maybe you put the face onto one of the candidates. You use the face to represent a certain type of identity or perspective or voter. And these sort of big meme vocabularies, they become a way of expressing a lot of different stuff. 

Morgan Sung: So one of the defining moments, I guess, the defining takeaways of 2016 was the use of like weaponized memes. Can you explain like, why meme make such good propaganda? 

Aidan Walker: So memes make good propaganda kind of in the way that any kind of art makes a good piece of propaganda. You know, you can be convincing someone at the same time as you’re entertaining them or making them laugh, which is always really powerful. But I also think memes can do really good visual rhetoric and then means are also, you know, very quick to make, very quick to share. You don’t necessarily have to attach your name to them. So people tend to say things that are a little more unhinged, a little more controversial. And then memes also, I think, invite users in to participate in the propaganda. So like when I’m liking a NUMTOT me, you know, I don’t just feel like I’m being lectured at about urban policy. I feel like I’m part of it.

Morgan Sung: NUMTOT, which stands for New Urbanist Memes for Transit oriented Teens is a public transportation themed Facebook group. Back in 2016, Facebook groups were one of the epicenters of meme culture. A lot of them followed a very similar naming structure like “Classical Studies Memes for Hellenistic Teens” or “Law School Memes for Edgy T14s.” One of the biggest overtly political Facebook groups at the time is a group called “Bernie Sanders Dank Meme Stash.” The group started with just 5000 members in January that year, and by May had over 400,000 just churning out memes criticizing Ted Cruz, Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. 

Aidan Walker: And I think it some of that has to do with that closeness. Like I think numtat a lot of these Facebook groups, in order to get into it you had to apply and I don’t think there was a very rigorous selection process. I vaguely remember just kind of being like a form that was like, why are you interested in transit? I think I said something like, I like trains, you know? 

Morgan Sung: Yeah. 

Aidan Walker: They let me in. 

Morgan Sung: These meme armies exist on both ends of the political spectrum. So Bernie Sanders supporters rally behind him and “Bernie Sanders Dank Meme Stash” and other meme groups. Trump supporters start a subreddit called “The Donald”, and at its height, it has over 790,000 subscribers. The group is so active that Reddit actually changes its algorithm because the site’s front page turns into just pro-Trump content. Reddit eventually banned “The Donald” in 2020 over the group’s harassment of others. Trump is also very popular on the anonymous image board “4chan”, which is known for its extreme content. The Facebook groups “The Donald”,   “4chan”, these are all relatively niche Internet communities that are generally siloed from those normal people that Aidan talked about. But they’re all so active and so effective at mobilizing that their content breaks into mainstream Internet culture and starts showing up all over those normal people’s feeds. 

Aidan Walker: So it was a lot of kind of very closed off communities that were probably numerically pretty small, but sort of had very committed posters. And so in a way, it’s sort of organizing the people who are most into something who have the most passion. 

Morgan Sung: The most well-known meme that takes off on 4chan is Pepe the Frog, who’s a relatively innocent web comic character created by cartoonist Matt Furie. 

Aidan Walker: He’s green. He has large eyes, you know, exaggerated features, and he’s sad in general. And he kind of got taken on as this avatar of posters on 4chan. And I think at first he kind of represented kind of being lonely, feeling maybe too chronically online. But then in maybe a weird parallel to kind of how NUMTOT begins as just train memes and then the density of people talking ends up turning into political activism. This Pepe meme, which my theory about it is that it’s sort of about, you know, loneliness, feeling, whatever, ended up kind of representing all this resentment that people had as well on that platform. 

Morgan Sung: People make countless memes of Pepe and on 4chan and other spaces. Trolls depict him with racist imagery or make him say really bigoted things. He becomes associated with white supremacy and the Alt Right. And after Trump retweets memes of himself as Pepe, alright Pepe means skyrocket. The Anti-Defamation League even describes Pepe as a hate symbol. And even though Pepe isn’t always used in a hateful context, today, he’s still associated with the Alt Right movement. But Pepe is only one example of the 2016 election’s lasting effect on internet culture today. 

Aidan Walker:  2016 I think, shaped internet culture more after the fact than during it, in that people responded to 2016 and Trump and also to Brexit as well by sort of saying this was an election in which memes definitely played a role in which the Internet and the social media platforms more broadly played a role with Cambridge Analytica and all that sort of stuff. So I think it was a moment where people kind of realized the power that was there. And in terms of how that impacted meme culture, I think it gave people a kind of awareness and self-consciousness, you know, that their posting mattered. 

Morgan Sung: And that sets the stage for 2020, which calls for a new tab. 2020 Election Pandemic Online. Okay. Bronze Age. Renaissance. Industrial Revolution. We’re in the modern age now. Before we get into Covid era campaigning, I want to note that between 2016 and 2020, Internet culture evolves drastically, means are weirder and develop a cynical, surreal undertone. Social media is way more divisive and more reactionary. Far right conservatives, emboldened by Trump’s presidency, are constantly clashing with so-called resistance libs. The mainstream liberal accounts that gained huge followings after the 2016 election and MeToo movement. And the United States feels like it’s at the precipice of a diplomatic crisis every time now President Trump tweets. Also, people are genuinely concerned that kids are eating tie pods. And then the pandemic happens. 

Aidan Walker: It’s interesting because you feel I always feel like there’s this kind of logical progression that’s happening and then Covid occurs.

Morgan Sung: Right.

Aidan Walker: So that, everybody is suddenly online a lot more. And I think had Covid not happened, a lot of things would be different, but internet culture would definitely be different. So 2020, and internet culture, in a way is a lot like 2016 and 2017. The normal people are online, but there’s also a kind of more fringe, more committed posters and smaller core communities that are able to influence kind of this mainstream narrative. And my perspective on 2020 is that the three major posting groups are kind of like, you know, resistance libs on Twitter who are definitely producing a lot of memes. And there’s, I think, a proximity between sort of mainstream resistance type people and kind of the normal conventional wisdom of non online people. And then there’s sort of left wing people like “Bernie Sanders Dank Meme Stash”, like Facebook group people and NUMTOT people. And then there’s sort of the right wing internet. And in 2020, I think you’re already seeing this increased separation between these three groups that now we definitely have with kind of Truth Social or Twitter under Elon it’s kind of their own zone. And algorithmically, I think even on the platforms that are still common, everyone like TikTok, there is more of a separation between these groups. But in 2020, everyone’s still in the same pot, I think. And so we’re seeing a lot of crossover, a lot of interplay, and I think a lot of opportunity for people to sort of influence the cumulative product of that pot, whatever the political soup is, with their own kind of hyper specific stuff. 

Morgan Sung: Hyper specific stuff like Gritty, the Philadelphia Fliers, chaotic orange mascot who’s depicted as Trump’s mortal enemy after Pennsylvania Goes Blue. And then post-election, the Bernie and Mittens meme, that image of the senator at Biden’s inauguration masked huddled up in a folding chair wearing these huge handknit mittens.

Aidan Walker: On one level, it’s sort of a silly joke, but on another level it reflects some kind of like a poetic truth about the way these people feel to us or what we want them to be. So, like Bernie with mittens is kind of this like, funny grandpa thing. He looked very grumpy and it sort of reflected this sense that I think some people who are kind of Bernie people maybe had about the inauguration. 

Morgan Sung: Right. 

Aidan Walker: And he kind of stood in for that emotion. 

Morgan Sung:  Right. It was the whole settle for Biden thing was huge. 

Aidan Walker:  And I’m remembering, too, that you say Covid era, he was socially distanced. That’s why he’s like alone, because he’s in a chair. It’s like at least six feet apart from everyone. 

Morgan Sung: Yeah. And so you mentioned Tiktok. For a long time, memes were pretty image based. They’re pretty static. We had like Vine, but, you know, it wasn’t it wasn’t as common to as like replicate trends as it is on TikTok. So how did TikTok blowing up influence political discourse and political memes in 2020? 

Aidan Walker: So TikTok for me isn’t just a social media platform, but it’s the kind of suite of editing tools that’s attached to it. And so I think TikTok suddenly allowed people not just literally to post and watch videos, but to make videos that were pretty sophisticated and pretty interesting as easily as they could, you know, copy and paste images and text into an image macro format. And so TikTok, I think, really, in a way, it made the Internet a little more normal and it makes it very accessible to people. 

Morgan Sung:  The live streaming platform Twitch was another way that all kinds of people were getting online and broadcasting themselves, especially during that time when so many of us were indoors online. And Aidan notes this shift in the way that politicians and political commentators are communicating with their audiences. Streamers like Hasan Piker become staple political pundits for Gen Z. 

Aidan Walker: There always was YouTubers who are out there, you know, making these videos, speaking directly to camera. And I think there is a certain intimacy to that kind of form. And so I think this sort of new class of political content creators start to rise by, in a way, doing the tactics that other types of influencers do, building these strong parasocial relationships, but also by, you know, definitely doing the infotainment thing. And for me, the big difference between past types of video person talking about you political media and like Twitch and Tik Tok is people often sort of want the Twitch people and the Tik Tok people to use a very informal register and kind of make it so politics isn’t the thing. You know, you feel like you have to put on your suit and tie or you have to like use the SAT words. 

Morgan Sung:  And speaking of Twitch, another huge moment of 2020 and Internet culture was AOC’s Among Us stream where she streams with not just political influencers, but also like  like huge creators who were mostly like gaming centered or like just talking centered but never touched politics. 

Among Us Stream:  Is that is that weird? To just call you AOC? 

AOC: No. No. 

Among Us Stream: What’s your preferance. 

AOC: You guys can call me AOC. Mike Pence can’t call me AOC, but you guys can definitely call me AOC. 

Among Us Stream: All right. 

Among Us Stream:  Okay. 

Morgan Sung: Like what? Like, why was that so impactful? 

Aidan Walker: That was really impact. I regret, actually, that I wasn’t able to log on to that. I heard about it afterwards. I was upset that I didn’t get to go. 

Morgan Sung: It was very fun because every time they brought someone on, I was like corpse husband. Like I was like, who? 

Aidan Walker:  That’s historic you’re on the live wow! 

Morgan Sung: I know. It was crazy. 

Aidan Walker: Yeah. So I feel like that matters because, like I’m saying, you often feel like politics is like a suit and tie thing. You’re like, Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez and now suddenly she’s out here chilling out that Twitch stream, you know? And it makes you feel as if you’re being listened to, that your hobbies are being recognized as I think gamers, you know, rightly or wrongly, sometimes feel like they’re looked down upon by mainstream polite society or it’s seen as frivolous. And now that politicians are engaging with you here and kind of saying, oh this is a worthwhile thing to do with your time, you know, your lifestyle, the way you live, kind of recognizing that and being there with people in that zone is a way of recognizing them and making them feel seen and valued, which I think is a big thing we want from politicians. In addition to, you know, policy. People care about feeling recognized, about feeling like the story of them their lives is told. 

Morgan Sung: This direct connection between politicians and online communities is showing up even stronger today in the 2024 election. 

Aidan Walker: I think this year really is about reaching out to people, being in the places where they spend time, which more and more often is online. You know, if the Aidn Ross listeners are going to vote for Trump, then I think they’re more likely to turn out if they feel that Trump is like in the zone, you know, taking them seriously. 

Morgan Sung:  When I talk to Rahaf, the digital anthropologist, she pointed out that our social media feeds today are so individualized — it’s like they all exist in different realities. Aidan made a similar point. 

Aidan Walker: I would describe it by thinking structurally about the platforms. So I think you have more separation between sort of where people who would vote Democrat are posting and where people who would vote for Trump are posting. I think they’re seeing less of each other. And so that’s certainly something that’s impacting the election. I think 2016, 2020, it was we were all in one pot together. 

Morgan Sung: We were all yelling at each other. 

Aidan Walker: Yelling at each other. 

Morgan Sung:  Right. 

Aidan Walker: And now, I mean, especially with Twitter, like I still go on and you kind of can’t go on Twitter without like seeing five crypto scans and, you know, various whatever, that kind of guy. But I find myself, you know, spending more time on Tiktok, spending more time on Instagram and kind of being in these places where everybody, you know, would agree with me. And you could say that there’s negative things to that like echo chamber. But I think it’s also positive in that it makes me feel more like I belong online. And I think a lot of people have that experience and get that sense of with these memes about the campaign feeling like they’re included, like they’re being listened to. And it also, I think, allows it to ferment and kind of get stronger and, you know, kind of the the pure, you know, shot of, you know, brat summer energy is there. Because the Internet, I think is very separated by kind of partizan group, here’s this sense among posters that, you know, this is our platform or Tiktok is for us, you know, or when the Tiktok ban happened, there are a lot of people who said it’s because, you know, we’re very pro-Palestine on this platform. But however well, Tiktok or whatever platform works for your side, I think it’s working just as well for the other side and sort of studying conspiracy theories, looking into memes and stuff. It’s clear that these same dynamics of viral spread of, you know, really intense in-group feeling and kind of closed communities serve every cause of the spectrum, regardless of how good or bad or fringe or mainstream it is. 

Morgan Sung: Okay. So we had talked earlier about how so much of the Internet is so siloed now by political party or by, you know, political leanings. But what are your predictions for how this will affect the internet going forward? 

Aidan Walker:  So I think in a way, the most powerful force will be parasocial relationships. And I would imagine that twitch streamers and content creators are going to be more politicized than they are right now. In part, because they’ll maybe find themselves inside of these silos where sort of intense political feeling and pressure will build and they’ll be pushed towards it or because, you know, they’ll literally be seen as the thought leaders, as the, you know, charismatic figures. And I think we will see a Twitch streamer president maybe within our lifetimes. 

Morgan Sung: Omg  I fear it but I can’t wait for it. 

Aidan Walker: Yeah, it’ll be amazing. He’ll just be like, chat, is this real? 

Morgan Sung: I know the press conferences will be so fun. I mean, like, yeah, I can’t wait til we’re emoting  in press conferences. 

Aidan Walker: Yeah.  State of the Union Livestream. 

Morgan Sung: Oh god. Yeah. 

Aidan Walker:  Yeah. 

Morgan Sung:  And that wraps up our deep dive for today. We’ve traced our way from the very first campaign websites all the way to candidates colliding with streamers. As the line between online and offline realities gets fuzzier, will the boundary between influencer and candidate also start to blur. Let’s just get through this election first, shall we? For now, it’s time to close all of these tabs. 

Morgan Sung: Close All Tabs is a production of KQED Studios, and is reported and hosted by me, Morgan Sung. Our managing producer is Chris Egusa. Our producer is Maya Cueva. Jen Chien edited the series and is KQED’s director of podcasts.

Original music and sound design by Chris Egusa. Additional music by APM. 

Audience engagement support from Maha Sanad. Katie Sprenger is our Podcast Operations Manager. Holly Kernan is our Chief Content Officer.  

A special shout out to the team at Political Breakdown for letting us share our episodes on their feed.

We’d love to hear what you think of the series! Hit us up at podcasts@kqed.org, that’s podcasts with an “s.” 

Thanks for listening!

Sponsored

lower waypoint
next waypoint