Suspended state Sen. Leland Yee is due back in court Friday, along with most of the other 28 co-defendants who have been caught up in the sprawling political corruption case that includes charges of gun trafficking, murder for hire, corruption and fraud.
The complicated, multi-part indictment is still a long way from trial. But that hasn’t stopped the speculation about possible defenses for the three lead defendants— Yee, Raymond “Shrimp Boy” Chow and Keith Jackson — all expected back in court Friday.
James Brosnahan, who is representing political consultant Keith Jackson, implied that a lack of physical evidence will be part of his defense against gun-trafficking charges. “The guns that are referred to, from the Philippines, do not exist. They are nowhere to be found,” Brosnahan said.
Rory Little, professor of law at UC Hastings, cautions against this defense. “We have in our society made the decision to have crimes, like conspiracy, like fraud, like bribery, that do not require any physical evidence,” Little said. “You don’t need guns to prove a conspiracy to import guns.”
In terms of political corruption charges facing Yee, arguing that the legal definition of bribery has not been met could make a stronger case, Little said. “This was not a specific quid pro quo for an official act by a senator,” he said.