Proposition 36
Should California roll back past reforms and make it easier to charge people with felony crimes and send them to jail or prison if they repeatedly shoplift, or possess some drugs, including fentanyl and methamphetamine?
Proposition 36 would roll back parts of a 2014 ballot measure (Proposition 47) which reclassified certain petty theft and drug possession crimes as misdemeanors instead of felonies. Proposition 36 would allow prosecutors to charge someone with a felony if they steal anything and have been convicted of theft twice before. It also lets prosecutors seek felony charges against people possessing drugs, including fentanyl, heroin and cocaine — although they could also be given the choice to enter drug treatment.
Yes Argument
California has a growing shoplifting and retail theft problem, driven by drug-addicted people who have no incentive to enter treatment. This measure would give prosecutors the power they need to crack down on repeat shoplifting offenders and compel drug users into treatment by providing a “stick” — potential jail or even prison time. The measure would help curb the state’s homelessness problem and lower overdose deaths by getting people the help they need.
No Argument
Proposition 36 would cost taxpayers up to $750 million a year and take money away from drug treatment, rehabilitation and victim services. Instead of funding drug treatment for people struggling with addiction, this measure would increase prison spending and bring back the war on drugs, leading to more crime. Police and prosecutors already have the tools they need to crack down on retail theft and other property crimes, and this measure does nothing to fund drug treatment opportunities.
FundraisingCampaign finance data comes from the California Secretary of State’s office or the Federal Election Commission.
Source: California Secretary of State
Key Supporters
In Support
- California District Attorneys Association
- London Breed, mayor, San Francisco
- Matt Mahan, mayor, San José
- Walmart
- Home Depot
In Opposition
- Gavin Newsom, governor, California
- Diana Becton, district attorney, Contra Costa County
- William Lansdowne, former police chief, city of San Diego
- ACLU of Northern California
- Californians for Safety and Justice
To learn more about how we use your information, please read our privacy policy.
Signed up.
More Statewide Propositions
Should California issue $10 billion in bonds to help build or upgrade educational facilities?
Should marriage rights for same-sex couples be enshrined in the state constitution?
Should California issue $10 billion in bonds to fund various climate- and environment-related projects?
Should California reduce the vote threshold needed to pass certain local bonds for affordable housing and public infrastructure projects?
Should California remove limits on the ability of cities to impose rent control policies capping annual rent increases?
Should California restrict how certain health care providers can spend revenue from prescription drug sales?
Should California make permanent an existing tax on health insurance companies and restrict how those funds can be used?