San Mateo County Measures

Results are a combination of data provided by the Associated Press (AP) and county election offices. The AP calls winners by analyzing vote tallies and other election data. Check marks are used to denote a winner only when the AP calls a race.

Colma. Sales tax. Passes with majority vote.

Yes82%
454 votes
No17.9%
99 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

Redwood City. Business license tax. Passes with majority vote.

Yes83.7%
26,988 votes
No16.2%
5,228 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

Menlo Park. Transient occupancy tax. Passes with majority vote.

Yes83.5%
13,009 votes
No16.4%
2,562 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

Belmont. Business license tax. Passes with majority vote

Yes84.6%
10,945 votes
No15.3%
1,980 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

Pacifica School District. Parcel tax. Passes with 2/3 vote.

Yes72.5%
13,902 votes
No27.4%
5,268 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

Millbrae. Term limit. Passes with majority vote.

Yes78%
7,729 votes
No21.9%
2,176 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

Burlingame School District. Parcel tax. Passes with 2/3 vote.

Yes74%
11,203 votes
No25.9%
3,936 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

Bayshore Elementary School District. School bond. Passes with 55% vote.

Yes71.2%
1,215 votes
No28.7%
490 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

Broadmoor Police Protection District. Parcel tax. Passes with 2/3 vote.

Yes42.5%
888 votes
No57.4%
1,197 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

Pescadero Municipal Advisory Council. Number of members. Passes with majority vote.

Yes72.5%
450 votes
No27.4%
170 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

East Palo Alto. Rental assistance. Passes with majority vote.

Yes77.4%
4,860 votes
No22.5%
1,418 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

Cabrillo Unified School District. School bond. Passes with 55% vote.

Yes62%
8,462 votes
No37.9%
5,179 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

San Carlos. Appoint city treasurer. Passes with majority vote.

Yes74.8%
11,206 votes
No25.1%
3,774 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

Pacifica. Transient occupancy tax. Passes with majority vote.

Yes77.7%
15,284 votes
No22.2%
4,380 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

Cabrillo Unified School District. Parcel tax. Passes with 2/3 vote.

Yes70.8%
9,706 votes
No29.1%
4,002 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

San Bruno Park School District. Term limit. Passes with majority vote.

Yes82.6%
12,419 votes
No17.3%
2,612 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

Belmont-Redwood Shores School District. School bond. Passes with 55% vote.

Yes67.4%
13,712 votes
No32.5%
6,622 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

San Bruno. Infrastructure bond. Passes with 2/3 vote.

Yes73%
12,703 votes
No26.9%
4,677 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

Half Moon Bay. Sales tax. Passes with majority vote.

Yes64.5%
3,969 votes
No35.4%
2,176 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

Ravenswood City School District. Parcel tax. Passes with 2/3 vote.

Yes78.6%
6,249 votes
No21.3%
1,696 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

San Mateo. Affordable housing. Passes with majority vote.

Yes59.3%
25,271 votes
No40.6%
17,283 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

Menlo Park City School District. School bond. Passes with 55% vote.

Yes71.9%
10,174 votes
No28%
3,962 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

Foster City. Business license tax. Passes with majority vote.

Yes74.1%
9,831 votes
No25.8%
3,421 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

South San Francisco. Business lincese tax. Passes with majority vote.

Yes80.8%
19,842 votes
No19.1%
4,693 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

San Bruno Park School District. Parcel tax. Passes with 2/3 vote.

Yes75.3%
11,919 votes
No24.6%
3,909 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

Woodside Elementary School District. Parcel tax. Passes with 2/3 vote.

Yes77.3%
1,536 votes
No22.6%
449 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

Jefferson Union High School District. Parcel tax. Passes with 2/3 vote.

Yes76.9%
38,447 votes
No23%
11,506 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

Colma, Measure AA

Should the town of Colma impose a 0.5% sales tax to fund general government purposes?

Colma. Sales tax. Passes with majority vote.

Yes82%
454 votes
No17.9%
99 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

Yes Argument

“As with other cities in the state of California facing state mandates and other costs, the town of Colma is not immune from needing to develop new revenue sources … Colma is a sales tax town and the services the town provides its residents, businesses and visitors is dependent on the tens of thousands of people who shop in our town each day.”

No Argument

None filed.

Redwood City, Measure BB

Should Redwood City amend the business license tax, with changes in rates varying with the size of the business?

Redwood City. Business license tax. Passes with majority vote.

Yes83.7%
26,988 votes
No16.2%
5,228 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

Yes Argument

“Redwood City’s current business license tax structure forces small, locally owned businesses to pay much higher tax rates compared to wealthier businesses, such as large corporations. We’ve allowed this injustice to go on for too long. Redwood City voters can end this unfairness by voting Yes on BB.”

No Argument

None filed.

Menlo Park, Measure CC

Should the city of Menlo Park raise the transient occupancy tax from 12% to 15.5% to fund general government purposes?

Menlo Park. Transient occupancy tax. Passes with majority vote.

Yes83.5%
13,009 votes
No16.4%
2,562 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

Yes Argument

“Yes on CC is 100% paid by visitors, tourists, and other nonresidents who visit Menlo Park. Why should we, Menlo Park residents, foot the entire bill for the local services and infrastructure visitors use while in our city? Vote Yes on CC to ensure out-of-town visitors pay their share to keep our small-town quality of life.”

No Argument

None filed.

Belmont, Measure DD

Should the city of Belmont change the existing business license tax to base rates on gross receipts?

Belmont. Business license tax. Passes with majority vote

Yes84.6%
10,945 votes
No15.3%
1,980 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

Yes Argument

“Measure DD is not a tax on Belmont residents or their property. Yes on DD ensures that existing large businesses pay their fair share for critical city services including police, fire, and emergency medical responses. Yes on DD treats our small businesses fairly so that they can stay and grow in Belmont.”

No Argument

None filed.

Pacifica School District, Measure EE

Should the Pacifica School District impose a parcel tax of $98 per parcel to improve school programs?

Pacifica School District. Parcel tax. Passes with 2/3 vote.

Yes72.5%
13,902 votes
No27.4%
5,268 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

Yes Argument

“Unfortunately, Pacifica School District is one of the lowest funded districts in San Mateo County. If we don’t do something to change that soon, we risk losing even more great local teachers and school staff. That’s why we need Measure EE. It will provide a dedicated source of locally controlled funding to prevent painful layoffs and maintain high-quality academic programs, ensuring our students will keep pace with other children across the county.”

No Argument

None filed.

Millbrae, Measure FF

Should the city of Millbrae change the term limit on all City Council members to no more than three successive full terms?

Millbrae. Term limit. Passes with majority vote.

Yes78%
7,729 votes
No21.9%
2,176 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

Yes Argument

“Having the shortest-term limits in the county has clearly put Millbrae at a disadvantage. Council members often must reach beyond our limits to learn about the solutions that will best serve the people, and now we’re asking if you, the voters of Millbrae, will allow the council members to stay another term and lead Millbrae to a safer, stronger, and more sustainable city.”

No Argument

None filed.

Burlingame School District, Measure GG

Should the Burlingame School District impose a parcel tax of $0.14 per building square foot and $25 per unimproved parcel to fund school programs and services?

Burlingame School District. Parcel tax. Passes with 2/3 vote.

Yes74%
11,203 votes
No25.9%
3,936 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

Yes Argument

“Funding for our local schools has not increased in more than 12 years, despite inflation. In fact, our schools receive among the lowest amount of state funding per-student in San Mateo County. Measure GG will help our schools keep up with the rising cost of providing a quality education and preventing teacher layoffs.”

No Argument

None filed.

Bayshore Elementary School District, Measure HH

Should the Bayshore Elementary School District issue $12.5 million in bonds to improve school facilities?

Bayshore Elementary School District. School bond. Passes with 55% vote.

Yes71.2%
1,215 votes
No28.7%
490 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

Yes Argument

“This will benefit the whole community. While our school has been well maintained since being built in 2017, aging classrooms and facilities are showing the wear and tear of constant use and are very expensive to repair. A local school improvement measure would allow the district to improve the quality of the school’s facilities and the educational programs provided to local students.”

No Argument

“Endless rounds of bond sales by school districts are not the answer to improving education. Government bonds should not be used to pay for school buildings, because government should not be building and running schools. Private alternatives, including home schooling, can do a better job for our children, at lower average cost.”

Broadmoor Police Protection District, Measure I

Should the Broadmoor Police Protection District of San Mateo County impose a parcel tax of 5% to fund police protection?

Broadmoor Police Protection District. Parcel tax. Passes with 2/3 vote.

Yes42.5%
888 votes
No57.4%
1,197 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

Yes Argument

None filed.

No Argument

“The existing $507.14 parcel tax has not made Broadmoor residents any safer than their neighbors, and nothing suggests giving the department yet another $297.30 will. The department will not commit to spend the funds on officer salaries. Instead, it will spend them as it does its existing budget, frittering taxpayer money away on lawyers, settlements of whistleblower lawsuits, and astronomical insurance premiums created by those lawsuits and its incompetence.”

Pescadero Municipal Advisory Council, Measure II

Should the Pescadero Municipal Advisory Council reduce its membership from 13 members to five?

Pescadero Municipal Advisory Council. Number of members. Passes with majority vote.

Yes72.5%
450 votes
No27.4%
170 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

Yes Argument

None filed.

No Argument

None filed.

Race to Watch

East Palo Alto, Measure JJ

Should East Palo Alto impose a 2.5% gross receipts tax on certain rental properties to fund rental assistance, prevent displacement and homelessness, and cover administrative costs?

East Palo Alto. Rental assistance. Passes with majority vote.

Yes77.4%
4,860 votes
No22.5%
1,418 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

Measure JJ proposes reallocating the 2.5% tax on gross receipts for certain rental properties to specifically fund affordable homeownership opportunities and preserve existing affordable housing. This existing tax, which cannot be passed onto tenants, is expected to generate about $1.45 million annually. It would not apply to landlords who demonstrate financial hardship, apartment units rented to people with federal rental assistance vouchers, rooms rented in single-family homes, accessory dwelling units and newly built rental properties for the first three years.

Yes Argument

East Palo Alto median rents have increased nearly 30% in the past two years, exacerbating a housing affordability crisis marked by displacement, homelessness, gentrification and evictions. Measure JJ will yield $1.45 million annually, funding initiatives such as temporary rental assistance to protect residents from displacement and homelessness. It also prohibits landlords from passing the tax onto tenants, who have already shouldered the burden of rising rents.

No Argument

None

Key Supporters

This list represents notable organizations and individuals who have taken a position on the ballot measure or candidate, or who are funding campaigns in support or opposition. This list is not exhaustive, and may be updated.

In Support

  • Martha Barragan, vice mayor, East Palo Alto 
  • Fr. Lawrence Goode, rector, Father St. Francis of Assisi Church
  • Stewart Hyland, former organizing director, Housing Leadership Council of San Mateo County
  • Antonio Lopez, mayor, East Palo Alto 
  • Appollonia “Mama Dee” Uhila, director, Anamatangi Polynesian Voices

In Opposition

  • None

Cabrillo Unified School District, Measure K

Should the Cabrillo Unified School District issue $153.4 million in bonds to improve school facilities?

Cabrillo Unified School District. School bond. Passes with 55% vote.

Yes62%
8,462 votes
No37.9%
5,179 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

Yes Argument

“Measure K improves our schools and helps our district remain competitive while protecting taxpayers. Join parents, grandparents, guardians, teachers, neighbors, business owners and community leaders in voting Yes on Measure K to preserve and protect our community’s most valuable assets!”

No Argument

“Endless rounds of bond sales by school districts are not the answer to improving education. Government bonds should not be used to pay for school buildings, because government should not be building and running schools. Private alternatives, including home schooling, can do a better job for our children, at lower average cost.”

San Carlos, Measure L

Should the office of the San Carlos city treasurer be an appointive position?

San Carlos. Appoint city treasurer. Passes with majority vote.

Yes74.8%
11,206 votes
No25.1%
3,774 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

Yes Argument

“Seventeen of the 20 cities in San Mateo County already have an appointed city treasurer. Currently, San Carlos holds an election for the city treasurer every four years, spending taxpayer funds on an elected position that only requires a candidate to be 18 years old and a registered voter. This allows potentially inexperienced candidates to become city treasurer.”

No Argument

“While it’s tempting to argue certain financial qualifications should be required, those benefits are outweighed by maintaining direct citizen oversight. The state of California treasurer likewise requires no such qualifications and is elected directly by the citizens. The fact that other peninsula cities have already converted to an appointed treasurer is not a reason for us to follow suit.”

Pacifica, Measure M

Should the city of Pacifica raise the transient occupancy tax to 15% to fund general government purposes?

Pacifica. Transient occupancy tax. Passes with majority vote.

Yes77.7%
15,284 votes
No22.2%
4,380 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

Yes Argument

“Yes on M is 100% paid by visitors, tourists and other nonresidents who come to Pacifica. Yes on M is not a tax on Pacifica residents of property owners. Every penny of Yes on M will be spent on services that benefit residents and visitors, including maintaining what makes our city unique like Pacifica’s parks, beaches, coastlines and trails.”

No Argument

“Visitors often compare accommodation costs when planning their travels, and a higher TOT can deter potential guests from choosing our city. This can result in decreased occupancy rates for local hotels and short-term rentals, ultimately reducing the overall revenue these businesses generate. Secondly, the hospitality industry is still recovering from the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Many hotels and short-term rental operators are working hard to rebuild their businesses and regain financial stability.”

Cabrillo Unified School District, Measure N

Should Cabrillo Unified School District impose a parcel tax of $198 per parcel to increase staff wages and expand school programs?

Cabrillo Unified School District. Parcel tax. Passes with 2/3 vote.

Yes70.8%
9,706 votes
No29.1%
4,002 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

Yes Argument

“Top-quality local public schools are the foundation of our community’s future. They create opportunities for all our children, provide every student with the resources to succeed, teach critical skills and prepare them for college and future careers. Investing in education benefits us all.”

No Argument

None filed.

San Bruno Park School District, Measure O

Should the San Bruno Park School District impose a term limit on all board members of three consecutive terms, after which they will be required to wait at least four years before becoming eligible to hold office again?

San Bruno Park School District. Term limit. Passes with majority vote.

Yes82.6%
12,419 votes
No17.3%
2,612 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

Yes Argument

None filed.

No Argument

None filed.

Belmont-Redwood Shores School District, Measure P

Should the Belmont-Redwood Shores School District issue $171 million in bonds to improve school facilities?

Belmont-Redwood Shores School District. School bond. Passes with 55% vote.

Yes67.4%
13,712 votes
No32.5%
6,622 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

Yes Argument

“The state does not provide adequate funding for facility updates at our schools without a local funding source like Measure P … Even if you don’t have school-age children, supporting quality education is a wise investment. Excellent schools improve the quality of life in our community and protect the value of our homes.”

No Argument

“Endless rounds of bond sales by school districts are not the answer to improving education. Government bonds should not be used to pay for school buildings, because government should not be building and running schools. Private alternatives, including home schooling, can do a better job for our children, at lower average cost.”

San Bruno, Measure Q

Should the city of San Bruno issue $102 million in bonds to fund general government purposes?

San Bruno. Infrastructure bond. Passes with 2/3 vote.

Yes73%
12,703 votes
No26.9%
4,677 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

Yes Argument

“Our community faces critical infrastructure challenges that demand our immediate attention. Despite our efforts to reduce overall costs, including eliminating non-essential functions and services and reducing staffing costs, we need to raise additional funding to address these specific urgent needs.”

No Argument

None filed.

Half Moon Bay, Measure R

Should the city of Half Moon Bay impose a 0.5% sales tax to fund general government purposes?

Half Moon Bay. Sales tax. Passes with majority vote.

Yes64.5%
3,969 votes
No35.4%
2,176 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

Yes Argument

“For Half Moon Bay, total public safety costs (our largest expenditure) increased approximately 51% heading into the current fiscal year. This increase, along with other inflation-based increased expenses and lagging tourism revenues, resulted in a multimillion-dollar annual structural deficit that is projected to continue into the foreseeable future … This sales tax would yield approximately $1.8 million–$2 million per year until the tax is terminated by voters.”

No Argument

None filed.

Ravenswood City School District, Measure S

Should the Ravenswood City School District impose a parcel tax of $434 per parcel to fund preschool and early childhood education programs?

Ravenswood City School District. Parcel tax. Passes with 2/3 vote.

Yes78.6%
6,249 votes
No21.3%
1,696 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

Yes Argument

“This parcel tax is essential to fulfill the Ravenswood Promise and empower every student to shape a brighter future for themselves and our community. When accounting for student needs, Ravenswood receives less state funds than nearly all of our neighboring school districts. In deep partnership with the community, together we have developed an action plan that prioritizes investments to create an exceptional and transformative education for all.”

No Argument

None filed.

Race to Watch

City of San Mateo, Measure T

Should the city of San Mateo allow taller buildings to be constructed in the downtown area, near Caltrain stations and along transit corridors including El Camino Real?

San Mateo. Affordable housing. Passes with majority vote.

Yes59.3%
25,271 votes
No40.6%
17,283 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

The city of San Mateo currently restricts building heights to seven stories or 75 feet tall citywide. Voters have approved initiatives in the past, including Measure Y in 2020, which restricted building heights and density. Measure T would amend those rules to allow buildings to be eight stories tall in certain areas, including downtown San Mateo, near CalTrans stations, and along busy thoroughfares such as El Camino Real and Highway 101.

Yes Argument

San Mateo is an expensive city to live in and longtime residents, seniors and younger residents are being pushed out. Measure T will add housing near transit hubs, shopping areas, and busy corridors, which could promote economic growth and transit use. It will create jobs and support downtown small businesses, without raising taxes.

No Argument

Measure T removes protections voters have approved previously. The potential growth from this initiative could strain existing infrastructure and services, possibly leading to higher taxes, fees and bonds. The city’s current height restrictions have still supported a vibrant downtown and more housing near transit hubs.

Key Supporters

This list represents notable organizations and individuals who have taken a position on the ballot measure or candidate, or who are funding campaigns in support or opposition. This list is not exhaustive, and may be updated.

In Support

  • Jerry Hill, former state senator
  • Lisa Diaz Nash, mayor, San Mateo
  • Tony Panacci, San Mateo County Firefighters, L2400
  • Anna Tsai, member, San Mateo County Housing and Community Development Community
  • Erica Wood, CEO, San Mateo Chamber of Commerce

In Opposition

  • Tom Lease, member, San Mateo Senior Citizens Committee
  • Claire Mack, former mayor, San Mateo
  • Thomas Morgan, former chair, Measure S Oversight Committee
  • Marlene Tam, advocate, AAPI Community and Public Safety 
  • Lisa Taner, former president, Beresford-Hillsdale Neighborhood Association

Menlo Park City School District, Measure U

Should the Menlo Park City School District issue $123.6 million in bonds to improve school facilities?

Menlo Park City School District. School bond. Passes with 55% vote.

Yes71.9%
10,174 votes
No28%
3,962 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

Yes Argument

“This measure may qualify the district for over $28 million in government funding and energy grants that wouldn’t otherwise be available, helping us leverage local dollars for maximum benefit. The district has a proven track record of financial stewardship, evidenced by its AAA bond rating and millions saved through prudent financial management.”

No Argument

“Endless rounds of bond sales by school districts are not the answer to improving education. Government bonds should not be used to pay for school buildings, because government should not be building and running schools. Private alternatives, including home schooling, can do a better job for our children, at lower average cost.”

Foster City, Measure V

Should Foster City change the business license tax with varying rates from $0.75 to $3.00 per $1,000 gross receipts?

Foster City. Business license tax. Passes with majority vote.

Yes74.1%
9,831 votes
No25.8%
3,421 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

Yes Argument

“Since 2016, three of our four main revenue sources have increased between 21% and 67%, while the fourth, our Business License Tax has had a meager revenue increase of 4%. This measure will add about $1.5 million in revenue annually without impacting the rates for over 94% of our businesses. This updating of our Business License Tax is one step toward the long-term sustainability of the quality of life we enjoy in Foster City.”

No Argument

None filed.

South San Francisco, Measure W

Should the city of South San Francisco amend the business license tax, with changes in rates varying with the size of the business?

South San Francisco. Business lincese tax. Passes with majority vote.

Yes80.8%
19,842 votes
No19.1%
4,693 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

Yes Argument

“South San Francisco’s Business License Tax is regressive and has not been updated since 2008. Currently, small businesses pay over 50% of the tax, and there is a cap that has limited the contribution of the largest corporations … South San Francisco needs a locally controlled source of revenue to maintain crucial services our residents depend on.”

No Argument

None filed.

San Bruno Park School District, Measure X

Should the San Bruno Park School District impose a $68 per parcel tax to maintain and improve school facilities?

San Bruno Park School District. Parcel tax. Passes with 2/3 vote.

Yes75.3%
11,919 votes
No24.6%
3,909 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

Yes Argument

“Of the 23 school districts in San Mateo, San Bruno Park is the only elementary school district that doesn’t have a dedicated source of local funding for our schools. Studies show that reducing teacher turnover rates leads to better classroom instruction and student achievement. We need Measure X to help attract and retain high-quality teachers and maintain academic programs that will ensure our students are successful in high school, college, and future careers.”

No Argument

None filed.

Woodside Elementary School District, Measure Y

Should the Woodside Elementary School District extend the parcel tax of $366.66 per parcel to support school funding?

Woodside Elementary School District. Parcel tax. Passes with 2/3 vote.

Yes77.3%
1,536 votes
No22.6%
449 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

Yes Argument

“Measure Y is a modest, thoughtful, simple extension, that asks for significantly less money than neighboring districts. Whether you have school-age children or not, supporting quality education is a wise investment. Great schools improve our local quality of life and protect home values. Measure Y will not increase local tax rates but will protect local education.”

No Argument

None filed.

Jefferson Union High School District, Measure Z

Should the Jefferson Union High School District impose a parcel tax of $95 per parcel to increase staff wages and expand school programs?

Jefferson Union High School District. Parcel tax. Passes with 2/3 vote.

Yes76.9%
38,447 votes
No23%
11,506 votes
Updated at 7:16 PM PT on Dec 3, 2024
San Mateo County

Yes Argument

“Our local public high schools — Jefferson, Oceana, Terra Nova, Thornton and Westmoor — are vital to our community’s prosperity. They enhance the value of our homes and businesses. They are also responsible for shaping the success of our community’s next generation. An investment in our schools is an investment in our future.”

No Argument

None filed.

More Results

See results for all elections on the San Mateo County ballot.

Have a correction? Contact voterguide@kqed.org.