upper waypoint

Booming Asian Population Could Gain Bigger Influence in New Bay Area Voter Maps

Save ArticleSave Article
Failed to save article

Please try again

A 2019 satellite image of the Bay Area. Changing demographics could significantly alter how the region is redistricted. (Courtesy of Copernicus)

California’s future political lines are being drawn and debated in a once-in-a-decade process that could strengthen political representation for the Bay Area’s growing Asian populations.

The redistricting is being carried out by a citizen panel whose decisions are rooted in the population changes reflected in the 2020 Census. In the last decade, California’s population that identifies as “Asian alone” grew by 1.2 million (25%) including an increase from 1.6 million to 2.4 million in the nine-county Bay Area (29%). In addition, California saw a 37.9% jump in people who identified as “Asian in combination” with another race.

In percentage terms, the state’s Native American population saw the largest growth (74%) of any group in California.

Those trends could result in more districts where Asian voters are either a majority or a powerful voting bloc. That, in turn, would require candidates to prioritize the issues that unite the region’s diverse Asian communities, such as culturally specific social services and protection against anti-Asian violence — or directly lead to the election of more Asian representatives, said Lee.

But political line drawing comes with trade-offs, and the commission is sure to draw fire for the communities they chose to group and split in a series of draft maps released this week.

“Redistricting is more art than science,” said David Lee, executive director of the Chinese American Voters Education Committee.

A proposed draft map from the California Citizens Redistricting Commission, released on Oct. 26, 2021, that unites Asian communities in San Francisco and Daly City. (California Citizens Redistricting Commission)

“Anybody can sit here and numerically move blocks along until you get a balanced district, but the art comes in terms of understanding the political implications of these moves,” said Lee. “What race or ethnicity might have a leg up if you draw the district one way or another?”

A clear goal of drawing political lines in the new maps, said Lee, is to give an expanded political voice to growing communities.

That political tapestry is in the hands of the California Citizens Redistricting Commission, a body of 14 residents created when voters passed Proposition 11 in 2008, taking the line-drawing powers away from the state Legislature.

The commission’s first priority is to draw maps of roughly equal size: roughly 1 million residents per state Senate district, 800,000 for congressional seats and 500,000 in each state Assembly district.

After that, said Commissioner Isra Ahmad, the maps must comply with the federal Voting Rights Act, which ensures that people of color have a fair shot at electing representatives of their choice.

“This really is to ensure that [people of color] have an equal opportunity, and it is tied to the historical exclusion of [these] groups in their power of voting,” said Ahmad, a Santa Clara County researcher.

The commission also tries to keep cities, counties and self-described “communities of interest” together, and to draw the districts in compact shapes.

When the state Legislature ran the district-drawing process in 2001, they prioritized the protection of their own incumbent lawmakers over uniting neighborhoods like Berryessa, a predominately Asian community in north San José.

“That particular neighborhood got chopped up so that it was then put into four different state Assembly districts and two different state Senate districts,” remembers Richard Konda, executive director of the San José-based Asian Law Alliance.

Berryessa residents and businesses were such a small voice in each of the districts that their concerns were easily overlooked by local representatives, said Konda.

In 2011, members of the community brought their concerns to the new citizens’ commission, and new lines reunified Berryessa in the most heavily Asian populated Assembly, Senate and congressional districts in California.

Ten years later, census results could push line-makers to draw more districts with a sizable share of Asian voters.

“When I’m thinking about the dynamics of the Bay Area, the main thing in my mind is what’s going to happen with [representation of people of color] — in particular, how is this growth in the Asian American community going to emerge?” said Eric McGhee, senior fellow at the Public Policy Institute of California.

The Citizens Redistricting Commission’s draft of congressional maps released on Oct. 26, 2021, splits Fremont from cities currently in the 17th Congressional District.

As the redistricting process got underway, delayed by the late release of census data, a network of Asian American, Pacific Islander, Arab, Middle Eastern, Muslim and South Asian advocacy groups formed the AAPI & AMEMSA State Redistricting Collaborative.

The group held local workshops for residents and drew its own series of district proposals, presenting the commission with maps that already had community input baked in.

“We got a lot of really great, rich information and tried to make sure folks were sharing that with the commission,” said Julia Marks, an attorney with Asian Americans Advancing Justice – Asian Law Caucus. “But fitting all these communities and data and legal requirements together to create an actual map proposal is a big puzzle.”

More political coverage

Some of the group’s ideas have been picked up by the redistricting commission, such as drawing a San Francisco Assembly district that combines the city’s Chinese communities — from the west side to Visitacion Valley and Bayview in the east — with Filipino neighborhoods in Daly City.

While those communities have unique identities, Marks said residents’ common “policy concerns and voting habits” justify their inclusion in a single district, “because that helps them have a stronger political voice and influence the outcome of both elections and policy conversations.”

In many cases, the commission must decide whether to draw districts with a majority of potential Asian voters or instead place slightly smaller shares of Asian residents into multiple districts.

Take the 17th Congressional District, represented by Democrat Ro Khanna. The South Bay seat currently includes Cupertino, Sunnyvale, Santa Clara, north San José, Milpitas and Fremont; almost half of the citizen voting-age population (CVAP) is Asian.

Despite opposition from the AAPI & AMEMSA State Redistricting Collaborative, draft maps released this week separate the city of Fremont from the rest of the cities currently in the 17th Congressional District, resulting in two districts where the Asian CVAP is 43% and 37%.

Using that approach, said McGhee, “might actually get more influence overall for that group than if you put them all in one district.”

A draft map released by the Citizens Redistricting Commission on Oct, 26, 2021, combines cities from Gilroy to Tracy into a congressional district.

The growth of the South Bay’s Asian population, combined with the commission’s focus on grouping Latino communities in the state’s agricultural regions, also creates some interesting implications for the balance of power in Congress.

In the latest maps, spillover population from Morgan Hill and Gilroy is grouped in a district that captures the Alameda County cities of Livermore and Sunol and then jumps across the Altamont Pass to Tracy.

Remove the liberal city of Tracy from the area currently represented by Democrat Rep. Josh Harder and that region becomes a lot harder for Democrats to win.

Time is running short for the commission to turn feedback into lines. The panel needs to release their final draft of maps by Nov. 15, and incorporate a last round of comments into the final maps due on Dec. 27.

Sponsored

Sponsored

lower waypoint
next waypoint