Santa Clara County Measures

Race to Watch

Morgan Hill, Measure A

Should Morgan Hill’s city council, mayor and treasurer have term limits of 12 consecutive years of service, and be allowed to seek reelection after a four-year hiatus?

Currently, city officials in Morgan Hill do not have term limits. Measure A would set term limits of 12 consecutive years for individuals to serve as city council member, mayor, treasurer, or any combination of the three. After 12 years, candidates would need to take a break of four years or more before running again for office.

Yes Argument

Measure A would allow more fresh perspectives in local government and avoid incumbents holding power indefinitely. By cycling out incumbents, Measure A would encourage more residents to participate in local politics, leading to a more engaged and diverse city council. Measure A would put Morgan Hill in line with all but one city in Santa Clara County that already has term limits for city council.

No Argument

Measure A would needlessly remove dedicated public servants from office. Measure A is unnecessary since every council member and the mayor is accountable to the electorate and can be voted out of office with or without term limits.

Key Supporters

This list represents notable organizations and individuals who have taken a position on the ballot measure or candidate, or who are funding campaigns in support or opposition. This list is not exhaustive, and may be updated.

In Support

  • Yvonne Martínez Beltrán, City Council member, Morgan Hill  
  • Rene Spring, City Council member, Morgan Hill

In Opposition

  • Gino Borgioli, City Council member, Morgan Hill

Race to Watch

Morgan Hill, Measure B

Should the mayor of Morgan Hill’s term be extended from two years to four years?

Measure B would extend the mayor’s term from its current two years to four years. The mayor’s first four-year term would begin in 2026.

Yes Argument

Measure B would encourage a fair standard by placing the mayor on a four-year term limit like the other four members of the City Council, allowing for greater consistency and continuity of leadership. Measure B would save the city an estimated $123,000 every two years by not putting the mayor on the ballot. Measure B would put Morgan Hill in line with numerous other cities which elect their mayors for four-year terms.

No Argument

Measure B would decrease voter engagement in years when a mayor is not up for election. Since Morgan Hill has district-based city council elections, Measure B would prevent half of the electorate from having a say in the make-up of city leadership every election, as they do now. Measure B would also force incumbent council members to choose between running for council or for mayor and discourage the competition that comes from two-year terms.

Key Supporters

This list represents notable organizations and individuals who have taken a position on the ballot measure or candidate, or who are funding campaigns in support or opposition. This list is not exhaustive, and may be updated.

In Support

  • Mark Turner, mayor, Morgan Hill
  • Marylin Librers, City Council member, Morgan Hill

In Opposition

  • Rene Spring, City Council member, Morgan Hill

Gilroy, Measure C

Should the city of Gilroy impose a 0.25% sales tax to fund general government purposes?

Yes Argument

None filed.

No Argument

None filed.

Palo Alto, Measure D

Should the city of Palo Alto repurpose a 0.33-acre portion of existing parkland in El Camino Park into a new road?

Yes Argument

None filed.

No Argument

None filed.

Sunnyvale, Measure E

Should the city of Sunnyvale issue $290 million in bonds to fund general government purposes?

Yes Argument

None filed.

No Argument

None filed.

Race to Watch

Sunnyvale, Measure F

Should the city of Sunnyvale allow people who are not registered voters to serve on more of its boards and commissions, and make other changes to its city charter?

Measure F would change Sunnyvale’s charter to remove requirements that a person must be a registered voter to serve on boards and commissions appointed by the City Council. It would allow noncitizens and youth to serve, as other city commissions and boards already do. The measure would change gender-specific language in the charter to gender-neutral, and allow the city more flexibility in scheduling city council meetings.

Yes Argument

Measure F would improve the function of Sunnyvale’s government and help meet evolving needs by broadening the pool of potential applicants for boards and commissions to match other existing eligibility requirements in the city. It would add flexibility to council meeting scheduling without impacting city business, and it would also make for a more modern and inclusive city charter by replacing gender-specific language with gender-neutral language throughout the document.

No Argument

Measure F makes it too easy for someone with no vetted affiliation to Sunnyvale to influence city decisions and direction. It removes the age requirement to serve on council-appointed boards and commissions, and replaces thorough residency verification with an inadequate honor system. Members of Sunnyvale’s five council-appointed boards and commissions should be verified residents of legal voting age. There is no data that shows Sunnyvale is having trouble recruiting qualified and diverse applicants under current requirements.

Mountain View, Measure G

Should the city of Mountain View increase the existing property transfer tax to fund general government purposes?

Yes Argument

None filed.

No Argument

None filed.

Santa Clara, Measure I

Should the city of Santa Clara issue $400 million in bonds to fund general government purposes?

Yes Argument

None filed.

No Argument

None filed.

Milpitas, Measure J

Should the city of Milpitas renew the 0.25% sales tax to fund general government purposes?

Yes Argument

None filed.

No Argument

None filed.

Campbell, Measure K

Should the city of Campbell impose a 0.5% sales tax to fund general government purposes?

Yes Argument

None filed.

No Argument

None filed.

San Benito High School District, Measure L

Should the San Benito High School District issue $70 million in bonds to build new school facilities and expand services?

Yes Argument

None filed.

No Argument

None filed.

San Benito High School District, Measure M

Should the San Benito High School District issue $70 million in bonds to improve school facilities?

Yes Argument

None filed.

No Argument

None filed.

East Side Union High School District, Measure N

Should the East Side Union High School District impose a parcel tax of $49 per parcel to improve teacher wages and school services?

Yes Argument

“Your Yes vote will ensure that the East Side Union High School District can attract and retain top-tier teachers and staff, support student growth and success and protect the value of our homes and businesses. Together, we can build a brighter future!”

No Argument

“Should you, the voter, reward the district for dropping scores in the two key subjects? If you answered ‘no,’ we encourage you to vote No on Measure N. ESUHDS is spending $20,413 per student per year (ADA), with 22 students per teacher. That’s a whopping $449,086 per classroom per year! Yet, they want even more of your hard-earned money to pad their salaries and fat pension plans.”

Campbell Union High School District, Measure P

Should the Campbell Union High School District issue $474 million in bonds to improve school facilities?

Yes Argument

“Every 8,600+ students attend school under aging roofs, in outdated science labs and career-training facilities, with deteriorating electrical, plumbing, ventilation and safety systems. Most of our high schools were built in the 1960s, and some classrooms/science labs haven’t been upgraded in 20 years. Measure P provides a prudent, responsible plan to continue repairing/modernizing CUHDS schools to ensure equal access to quality instruction/learning and improve student safety.”

No Argument

“From the 2020–22 school year to 2022–23 (latest figures) enrollment has declined by 199 students. Down to 8,006 students. But they want more money! Does that make any sense to you? No? Then please vote No on P. This bond costs $59,205 per student and that’s before 30+ years of interest expenses at rates up to 12%.”

Milpitas Unified School District, Measure Q

Should the Milpitas Unified School District impose a parcel tax of $119 per parcel to improve school facilities?

Yes Argument

“Offering strong educational programs such as computer science and technology courses is essential for preparing our students for quickly changing workforce and the jobs of tomorrow. Measure Q protects our schools from the instability of the state budget and provides stable local funding Milpitas students can count on every year.”

No Argument

“Should you, the voter, reward the district for dropping scores in the two key subject areas? If you answered ‘no,’ we encourage you to vote No on Measure Q. MUSD is spending $17,384 per student per year (ADA) and has 22.9 students per teacher. That’s a whopping $398,093 per classroom per year. Yet, they want even more of your and your neighbors’ hard-earned money to pad their salaries and fat pension plans.”

Race to Watch

 San José Unified School District, Measure R

Should voters approve a $1.15 billion bond for the San José Unified School District?

Measure R would authorize a $1.15 billion bond to renovate buildings and athletic facilities across the San José Unified School District, as well as construct affordable rental housing for teachers and staff. The bond is estimated to cost taxpayers $60 per $100,000 of assessed property value, annually, through 2055. The total cost of the bond, including interest, is $2.4 billion. The measure needs 55% approval to pass.

Yes Argument

The district serves some 25,000 students in increasingly outdated facilities. Supporters say the bond would improve these facilities by upgrading school safety features, as well their heating and cooling systems. It would also update classroom and lab spaces to assist students in preparing for college and job-training programs. Furthermore, supporters say the bond would fund another district priority: constructing affordable rental housing to help retain teachers and support staff.

No Argument

Opponents argue the school district shouldn’t enter the real estate business. They say the measure doesn’t specify how much money would be set aside for district needs and how much would fund each affordable housing project. Furthermore, they pointed to a June grand jury report that criticized the district’s management practices as evidence it shouldn’t be trusted with an influx of cash and said the money would be better spent on improving students’ educational outcomes.

Key Supporters

This list represents notable organizations and individuals who have taken a position on the ballot measure or candidate, or who are funding campaigns in support or opposition. This list is not exhaustive, and may be updated.

In Support

  • Tamara Alvarado, parent, San José Unified School District
  • Raul Peralez, former City Council member, San José
  • Renata Sanchez, president, San José Teachers Association

In Opposition

  • Dawn Davis, resident
  • Joe Dehn, chairperson, Libertarian Party of Santa Clara County
  • Mark Hinkle, president, Silicon Valley Taxpayers Association

Mount Pleasant Elementary School District, Measure S

Should the Mount Pleasant Elementary School District issue $28 million in bonds to improve and expand school facilities?

Yes Argument

“The future success of our children depends on the quality of our local elementary and middle schools. Modern classrooms with relevant and up-to-date technology are critical in preparing our children for high school and opening doors for their future success. Mt. Pleasant Elementary School District needs our help to guarantee our children have the resources necessary to succeed. High-quality schools and classrooms for our children must remain our top priority.”

No Argument

“MPESD’s enrollment declined from 2,229 students during the 2018–19 school year, to 1,648 during 2022–23. A whopping ADA decline of 581 students. Why ‘expand’ new classrooms when enrollment is down to 1,648 children?? Those two bond obligations equal $31,553 per student — plus decades of interest payments. Since the number of students is way down, expenses should be way down, too.”

Mount Pleasant Elementary School District, Measure T

Should the Mount Pleasant Elementary School District issue $24 million in bonds to improve and expand school facilities and services?

Yes Argument

“Our schools are so much more than simply places for learning. They provide a secure and stable environment where our children can grow and thrive. They foster success for future generations. Additionally, quality schools improve and protect the value of our homes and businesses. For all those reasons, they are our community’s most valuable assets. Vote Yes on Measure T to repair and renovate our local elementary and middle schools.”

No Argument

“Education Data Partnership shows the District’s enrollment declining from 2,753 students during the 2009–10 school year, to 1,511 during 2022–23. A whopping ADA decline of 1,242 students. Why construct new classrooms when enrollment is down to 1,511 students??? Since the numbers of students are way down, expenses should be way down, too.”

Moreland School District, Measure U

Should the Moreland School District renew the $142 annual parcel tax to improve school facilities?

Yes Argument

“Unfortunately, years of state budget cuts and the expiration of our existing community supported parcel tax are threatening the local quality of education. If we don’t pass Measure U, MSD will have to make drastic cuts to academic programs, increase class sizes, and maintain only the basics. Measure U is necessary! We depend on local revenue to supplement limited state funding!”

No Argument

“The district is spending $18,881 per child per year (ADA), with 21.2 pupils per teacher. That is a whopping $400,277 per classroom per year. Yet, they want even more of your hard-earned money to pad their salaries and fat pension plans. The district let taxpayers and voters down, with decreased test scores, then increased the average teacher’s salary.”

Union Elementary School District, Measure V

Should the Union Elementary School District replace an expiring parcel tax at the rate of $148 per parcel to support school funding?

Yes Argument

“If we don’t pass measure V, about $1.3 million will disappear from USD school budgets. Our local TK–8 schools will have to make drastic cuts to academic programs, increase class sizes, and maintain only basics. USD depends on local revenue to supplement limited State funding.”

No Argument

“Union School District is spending $15,245 per student per year (ADA) with an average of only 21.6 students per teacher. That’s a whopping $458,892 of spending per classroom per year. Yet, they want even more of your and your neighbors’ hard-earned money to pad their salaries and fat pension plans. Union School District punished taxpayers with drops in test scores, then increased the average teacher’s salary.”

Franklin­-McKinley School District, Measure W

Should the Franklin­-McKinley School District renew the parcel tax of $192 per parcel to maintain school funding?

Yes Argument

“For years, our community has supported quality education in our elementary and middle schools with locally controlled funding. However, this funding is set to expire. Measure W will help prevent talented teachers from leaving our community and protect our core academic programs. It will help struggling students by maintaining and expanding literacy programs, and ensure all students are prepared for high school, college and in-demand careers.”

No Argument

“Should you, the voters, reward the district for dropping scores in two key subjects? If not, we encourage you to vote No on Measure W. The School District is spending $24,821 per student per year (ADA) with a student/teacher ratio of 23.4 to 1. That’s $580,811 per classroom per year. Yet, they want more of your hard-earned money to pad their salaries and fat pension plans.”

Evergreen Elementary School District, Measure X

Should the Evergreen Elementary School District renew the annual parcel tax of $125 per parcel to improve school programs and maintain staff wages?

Yes Argument

“Vote Yes on Measure X to support our children’s success and help ensure that Evergreen Elementary School District has the qualified teachers and staff our students deserve. Educators are the backbone of our educational system and essential to student success. Investing in our schools also enhances the value of our homes and businesses — with no increase in tax rates.”

No Argument

“The school district is spending $18,807 per child per year (ADA) with 24.7 students per teacher. That’s a whopping $464,532 per classroom per year. Yet, they want even more of your and your neighbors’ hard-earned money for padding their salaries and fat pension plans.”

Sunnyvale School District, Measure Y

Should the Sunnyvale School District renew the $59 per parcel tax to support school funding?

Yes Argument

“Sunnyvale schools are among the best in the county because of voter support. By continuing this local investment in our schools, we protect our award-winning programs and provide all students better access to computers and technology. We have great support from our community who expect excellence in our schools and classrooms. Great schools make for great communities. Quality schools and classrooms protect and enhance our property values and support our students.”

No Argument

“Should you, the voters, reward the district for dropping scores in two key subjects? If not, we encourage you to vote No on Measure Y. The school district is spending $17,693 per student per year (ADA) with a student/teacher ratio of 20.2 to 1. That’s $357,398 per classroom per year. Yet, they want more of your hard-earned money to pad their salaries and fat pension plans.”

Cupertino Union School District, Measure Z

Should the Cupertino Union School District issue $347 million in bonds to improve school facilities?

Yes Argument

“The continuing prosperity of our communities depends on the success of our public elementary schools. They keep our children safe, teach them critical skills, prepare them for the future and enhance the value of our homes and businesses. Our schools are our communities’ most valuable assets and must remain our top priority.”

No Argument

“Between the school years of 2018–19 to 2022–23 (latest figures), enrollment has declined by 3,896 students, down to 13,467 students. This bond will cost a whopping $25,766 per student— and that’s before 30+ years of interest expenses at rates of up to 12%. Yikes!!! Will this $347 million bond debt be spent to hire or train great teachers to improve academics? Answer: No, that’s not legally permitted.”

Mountain View Whisman School District, Measure AA

Should the Mountain View Whisman School District renew the parcel tax of $0.15 per building area square foot to support school funding?

Yes Argument

“Voting Yes on Measure AA will renew a critical source of expiring local school funding that supports quality teachers and academics. Measure AA means large corporations will pay more than single-family homeowners, ensuring large property owners contribute their fair share to support our local schools. In fact, some residents will even see a reduction in their property taxes, with senior citizen’s being exempt from the cost altogether.”

No Argument

“Mountain View Whisman School District is spending $26,604 per student per year (ADA) with only 18.6 students per teacher. That’s a whopping $494,834 per classroom per year. Yet, they want even more of your and your neighbors’ hard-earned money for padding their salaries and fat pension plans.”

Cambrian School District, Measure BB

Should the Cambrian School District renew the annual parcel tax to support school funding?

Yes Argument

“Measure BB is necessary! We depend on local revenue to supplement limited State funding. Without Measure BB, the budget would need to be cut by nearly a million dollars. This would force all Cambrian schools to make drastic cuts to academic programs and increase class sizes. Measure BB does not increase taxes, it simply continues our already existing modest parcel tax.”

No Argument

“The school district is spending $17,693 per student per year (ADA) with a student/teacher ratio of 21.9 to 1. That’s $387,476 per classroom per year. Yet, they want even more of your hard-earned money to pad their salaries and fat pension plans.”

Los Gatos Union School District, Measure CC

Should the Los Gatos Union School District issue $163 million in bonds to improve school facilities?

Yes Argument

“Measure CC will provide locally controlled funding for elementary and middle school classrooms that support programs like STEAM, literacy, music, and the performing arts — all of which will help us maintain the high-achieving, well-rounded education our students need.”

No Argument

“Enrollment is declining significantly. From the 2018–19 school year to 2022–23 (latest figures) enrollment has declined by 251 students. Down to 3,269 students. This bond costs $49,862 per student and that’s before 30+ years of interest expenses at rates up to 12%.”

Los Altos School District, Measure EE

Should the Los Altos School District issue $350 million in bonds to improve school facilities?

Yes Argument

“We need Measure EE to provide the exceptional education our community expects. We also know that having 10 schools at nine campuses isn’t working — with hundreds of students taking classes at overcrowded junior high schools in dilapidated portables. Measure EE provides funding for 10 schools on 10 campuses, relieving overcrowding, restoring small neighborhood schools, and replacing temporary portables with permanent classrooms.”

No Argument

“Enrollment is declining significantly. From the 2018–19 school year to 2022–23 (latest figures) enrollment has declined by 891 students. Down to 3,355 students. Does that make any sense to you? No? Then please vote No on EE. This bond costs $104,321 per student and that’s before 30+ years of interest expenses at rates up to 12%.”

Orchard School District, Measure GG

Should the Orchard School District issue $30 million in bonds to improve school facilities?

Yes Argument

“Our community has been supportive of bonds in the past and the schools and students have benefitted from our investment. We need to continue our investment in the modernization of Orchard School and make sure we serve all students with safe and modern classrooms. Great schools are part of what makes our area a great place to live.”

No Argument

“Current ADA enrollment is down to 720, following a steady decline since the 2018–19 school year. So does constructing more classrooms make any sense to you? No? Then please vote No on Measure GG. This bond costs $41,666 per child — and that’s before the 30+ years of interest expenses at rates of up to 12%.”

Lakeside Joint School District, Measure HH

Should the Lakeside Joint School District renew the parcel tax of $647 to support school funding?

Yes Argument

“If Measure HH fails, Lakeside loses more than $500,000 annually in locally controlled funding. That’s more than 20% of the budget! Without Measure HH, the district will be forced to make deep cuts, including teacher layoffs, loss of academic programming, and even the closure of Lakeside School.”

No Argument

“The proponents ask you to approve this parcel tax to ‘retain high quality teachers’, but the big money is going to administrators. Lakeside just hired a full-time principal and an executive assistant, pushing costs for non-teachers to over $500,000/year, including $268,000 for a superintendent. All this to manage six classrooms and 60 students.”

More Races

Find information about more elections on the Santa Clara County ballot.

Have a correction? Contact voterguide@kqed.org.